Openwave Systems Inc. v. Apple Inc. et al

Filing 6

STIPULATION and Proposed Order to Stay Action Pending ITC Determination by Apple Inc., Openwave Systems Inc., Research In Motion Corp., Research In Motion LTD.. (Herrmann, Richard)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) APPLE INC., RESEARCH IN MOTION LTD. ) ) and RESEARCH IN MOTION CORP., ) Defendants. ) OPENWAVE SYSTEMS INC., C.A. No. 11-765 MSG STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY ACTION PENDING ITC DETERMINATION Plaintiff Openwave Systems Inc. (“Openwave”) and Defendants Apple Inc. (“Apple”), Research In Motion Ltd. and Research In Motion Corp. (collectively “RIM”) hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows: On August 31, 2011, Openwave filed its Complaint against Apple and RIM in this action (“the Delaware action”), alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,233,608, 6,289,212, 6,405,037, 6,430,409 and 6,625,447. These same five patents are at issue in an ongoing ITC action, Investigation No. 337-TA809 (“the ITC action”), instituted on October 7, 2011. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1659, Apple and RIM are entitled to a mandatory stay of the Delaware action until the determination of the Commission becomes final. The parties agree to an immediate stay of the Delaware action until such time as the ITC action has been finally resolved. /s/ Rodger D. Smith II Jack B. Blumenfeld (#1014) Rodger D. Smith II (#3778) MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP 1201 North Market Street Wilmington, DE 19801 (302) 658-9200 _ /s Richard K. Herrmann Richard K. Herrmann (#405) Mary B. Matterer (#2696) Kenneth L. Dorsney (#3726) MORRIS JAMES LLP 500 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1500 Wilmington, Delaware 19801 (302) 888-6800 Attorneys for Plaintiff Openwave Systems Inc. _ Attorneys for Defendant Apple Inc. /s/ Richard L. Horwitz _ Richard L. Horwitz (#2246) David E. Moore (#3983) POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP Hercules Plaza, 6th Floor 1313 N. Market Street Wilmington, DE 19899 (302) 984-6000 Attorneys for Defendants Research In Motion Ltd. and Research In Motion Corp. IT IS SO ORDERED this ____ day of ________, 2011. ________________________________ United States District Court Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?