Power Management Solutions LLC v. Advanced Micro Devices Inc.

Filing 49

CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER (see Order for construction of terms). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 5/30/2013. (nms)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
POWER MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS
LLC,
Plaintiff,

v.
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

l
I

C.A. No. 12-426 (RGA) (CJB)

CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER

The parties having briefed their positions on construction of the claims of United States
Patent No. 5,504,909 (the '"909 patent"), and the Court having conducted a consolidated Markman
hearing on the disputed terms on January 18, 2013, 1 it is hereby ordered that, as used in the '909
patent, the terms below are construed as follows:

I.

AGREED-UPON TERMS

The parties agreed upon the constructions of certain terms of the '909 patent, and the Court
accepts them as set forth below for the purposes of this litigation.
Claim Term:

"first control input"

Agreed upon Construction:

the structural element of the power gating means that receives
the signal that controls the power gating means

Claim Term:

"second control input"

Agreed upon Construction:

the structural element of the switching means that receives the
signal that controls the switching means

The Markman hearing in this action was consolidated with Markman hearings in two other
actions involving the '909 patent: Power Management Solutions, LLC v. Intel Corp. et al., C.A.
No. 11-743 (RGA), and Power Management Solutions, LLC v. NVJDJA Corp., C.A. No. 12-427
(RGA).

r

I

\

I

Claim Term:

"means for constructing and interconnecting electrical
circuits"

Agreed upon Construction:

integrated circuit substrate

Claim Term:

"power gating means"

Agreed upon Construction:

I

This limitation is governed by 35 U.S.C. § 112, ~ 6.
Function:
coupling power between the external power supply
and the internal functional circuit in response to the
assertion of the second externally generated electrical
signal, and uncoupling power between the external
power supply and the internal functional circuit in
response to the deassertion of the second externally
generated electrical signal
Corresponding Structure:
A power gate as defined at col. 3:61-4:8, and as shown
as elements 60 and 61 in figures 2 through 4. A power
gate is a power switching means for making or
breaking a connection between a power source and its
load on command, implemented as an electrically
controllable electronic switch. A power gate consists
of three terminals: a control input terminal, a power
input terminal, and a power output terminal. When the
control input terminal is asserted, the power gate
causes a low impedance to be presented between the
power input terminal and the power output terminal.
When the control input terminal is deasserted, the
power gate causes a high impedance to be presented
between the power input terminal and the power
output terminal. A power gate differs from an 1/0
switch in that it is capable of transferring a specified
amount of power from its power input terminal to its
power output terminal with a specified efficiency.

2

I

Claim Term:

"switching means"

Agreed upon Construction:

This limitation is governed by 35 U.S.C. § 112, ~ 6.

Function:
coupling the first electrical signals passed between the
external functional circuit and the internal functional
circuit in response to the assertion of the second
externally generated electrical signal, and uncoupling
the first electrical signals passed between the external
functional circuit and the internal functional circuit in
response to the deassertion of the second externally
generated electrical signal

Corresponding Structure:
An I/0 switch as defined at col. 4:9-22, and as shown
as elements 62 and 63 in figures 2 through 4, which is
a bidirectional switch as shown by the bidirectional
arrows of connection means 32, 52 and 33, 53. An 1/0
switch is an electronically controllable electronic
signal switching means for isolating a powered-on
circuit from a powered-off circuit. An 1/0 switch
consists of three terminals: a control input terminal, a
signal input terminal, and a signal output terminal.
When the control input terminal is asserted, the I/0
switch causes a low impedance to be presented
between the signal input terminal and the signal output
terminal. When the control input terminal is
deasserted, the 1/0 switch causes a high impedance to
be presented between the signal input terminal and the
signal output terminal. An I/0 switch differs from a
power gate in that it is required to transport a signal
from its signal input to its signal output with specified
fidelity.

3

I

Claim Term:

"sequencing means"

Agreed upon Construction:

This limitation is governed by 35 U.S.C. § 112, ~ 6.

Function:

I

controlling the relative time relationship of changes in
the state of coupling in the power gating means and in
the switching means

Corresponding Structure:
A sequencer as disclosed at '909 Patent, Col. 14:5665, and as shown as element 65 in figure 4. A
sequencer has two output terminals: a power gate
control output terminal and a switch control output
terminal. The power gate control output terminal of the
sequencer is connected to the control input terminals
of the power gates via a connection means. The switch
control output terminal of the sequencer is connected
to the control input terminals on the 110 switches via a
connection means.

Claim Term:

"third electrical signal"

Agreed upon Construction: 2

an electrical control signal that is passed from the sequencing
means to the first control input of the power gating means at a
different time than the fourth electrical signal is sent to the
switching means

Claim Term:

"fourth electrical signal"

Agreed upon Construction:

an electrical control signal that is passed from the sequencing
means to the second control input of the switching means at a
different time than the third electrical signal is sent to the
power gating means

2

The parties reached agreement on the construction of the "third electrical signal" and
"fourth electrical signal" terms following the Markman hearing.

4

l

II.

DISPUTED TERMS
The parties have disputed the constructions of certain other terms of the '909 patent. The

Court adopts the following constructions of those terms:
1.

The term "internal" is construed to mean "on the integrated circuit substrate" and

the term "external" is construed to mean "off the integrated circuit substrate."3 The claims,
specification and prosecution history all support this construction of "internal" and "external."
Claim 1 divides internal components and external components based on whether they are on the
integrated circuit substrate or off the integrated circuit substrate, respectively. The three claim
components that are claimed to be on the integrated circuit substrate are: (1) the internal functional
circuit, (2) a power gating means, and (3) a switching means. '909 patent at col.l9 11.25-27.
Similarly, claim 2 claims "a buffering means" "on the integrated circuit substrate," id. at col.20
ll.23-25, and claim 3 claims a "sequencing means" "on the integrated circuit substrate." !d. at
col.20 ll.32-34. By contrast, none of the claims lists the "external power supply" or the "external
functional circuit" among the components that are "on the integrated circuit substrate." These
"external components," therefore, must be off the integrated circuit substrate.
The Court's constructions of "internal" and "external" are also supported by the
distinctions that the patentees drew between the first embodiment and the second embodiment of
the claimed invention. The patent specification expressly distinguishes the first and second
embodiments by stating that "[t]he first embodiment represents an internal solution, the second
embodiment represents [an] external solution." !d. at col.6 ll.57-58. In the first embodiment, the
"internal" power management apparatus is on the integrated circuit substrate with the internal

3

The parties in this action proposed different constructions for "internal" and "external." The
Court adopts these constructions to be consistent with the -427 and -743 actions.

5

functional circuit, id. at col.5 ll.43-46, whereas in the second embodiment, the "external" power
management apparatus is off the integrated circuit substrate that contains the internal functional
circuit. !d. at col.5 11.55-66; id. at col.6 11.43-45.
Finally, the '909 patent's prosecution history also supports these constructions. Asserted
claim 1 was an amendment to a cancelled claim that was numbered claim 13, which was an
amendment to a cancelled claim numbered claim 7, which was an amendment to the patentees'
originally filed claim 1. (D.I. 85, Exs. 1 and 2). For each of these amendments, the patentees
explained that the amendment "is a rewrite" and "does not represent new material." Accordingly,
the cancelled claims 13 and 7 provide additional evidence of how the patentees used the modifiers
"internal" and "external" in the '909 patent. Phillips v. AWHCorp., 415 F.3d 1303, 1317 (Fed.
Cir. 2005) (en bane). Specifically, cancelled claim 7 required "at least one signal pad" and
provided that "one or more first electrical signals are controllably passed between an external
electronic circuit connected to one or more signal pads to the functional circuit." (D.I. 85, Ex. 1).
The patent defines a "pad" as "an area of an integrated circuit substrate." '909 patent at col.411.4749. These pads, thus, are the connections between the integrated circuit substrate and the devices
external to, or off, the integrated circuit substrate.
2.

The term "internal functional circuit" is construed to mean "a circuit on the

integrated circuit substrate that performs a specified electronic function or group of electronic
functions." This construction is consistent with the Court's construction of"internal" and the term
"functional circuit" as that term is defined in the patent. '909 patent at col.4 11.31-32 (defining
"functional circuit" as "a means for performing a specified electronic function or group of
electronic functions.").

6

3.

The term "external functional circuit" is construed to mean "a circuit off the

integrated circuit substrate that performs a specified electronic function or group of electronic
functions." As with "internal functional circuit," this construction is consistent with the Court's
construction of "external" and the term "functional circuit" as that term is defined in the '909
patent.
4.

The term "externally generated" is construed to mean "generated off the integrated

circuit substrate." This construction is consistent with the Court's construction of"external."
5.

The term "second externally generated electrical signal" is construed to mean "a

'
!

I
!

I

'
I

I
I

signal generated off the integrated circuit substrate that controls the coupling and uncoupling of
the power gating means, and the coupling and uncoupling of the switching means."

This

construction is consistent with the Court's construction of "external." This construction is also
consistent with the specification.

The specification consistently describes the power control

signals that control the power gates and I/0 switches as being generated off the integrated circuit
substrate. See, e.g., '909 patent, Figs. 2-7; id. at col.l411.29-42; col.l5ll.6-8. These I/0 pads are
the integrated circuit substrate's interfaces to devices off the integrated circuit substrate. See '909
patent, col.4ll.4 7-49. The fact that the "power control signal" enters the integrated circuit substrate
through an 1/0 pad in every embodiment further confirms that the second externally generated
electrical signal is generated off the integrated circuit substrate.
6.

The term "internal functional circuit function" is construed to mean "the specified

electronic function or group of electronic functions that the internal functional circuit was designed
to perform using power and the first electrical signals." This construction is consistent with the
specification, which defines "functional circuit" as a "means for performing a specified electronic
function or group of electronic functions." '909 patent at col.4 11.31-32.

7

i

I
I

I

7.

The term "allowing submicrosecond recovery of internal functional circuit function

I
I
f
I

upon the assertion of the second externally generated electrical signal" is construed to mean
"allowing recovery of the specified function or group of electronic functions of the internal
functional circuit in less than one microsecond from the assertion of the second externally
generated electrical signal." This construction is consistent with the '909 patent's definition of
"functional circuit."

III.

DISPUTED TERMS SPECIFIC TO THIS CASE
The Court adopts the following constructions of the terms specific to this case:
1.

I
I

I

The term "first electrical signals" is construed to mean "electrical signals that are

input to, and/or output from, an internal functional circuit." This construction is consistent with
the construction agreed upon by the parties in the -427 and -743 actions. AMD's construction
would require that all electronic signals that travel through the switching means be "first electrical
signals," which is not supported by the claims, specification or prosecution history.
2.

The term "electrical power is controllably passed from an external power supply

through the power gating means to the internal functional circuit" is construed to mean "electrical
current is controllably passed from a supply located outside of the area to which power
management is being applied through the power gating means to the internal functional circuit."
This construction is consistent with the term's plain and ordinary meaning. AMD's proposed
construction would exclude alternative embodiments of the invention disclosed in the '909 patent's
specification, which specifically describes embodiments in which input pads are neither required
f

nor warranted. '909 patent at col.9 11.5-20.

I
,
!

8

f

l

l
The term "one or more first electrical signals are controllably passed between an

f

external functional circuit and the internal functional circuit via the switching means" is given its

f

3.

J

plain and ordinary meaning, consistent with the Court's construction of the terms "internal
functional circuit" and "external functional circuit." The Court's construction does not require
pads.

AMD's proposed construction, which requires pads, would exclude alternative

embodiments of the invention disclosed in the '909 patent's specification. '909 patent at col.911.520.

~

Entered this '301;y of May, 2013.

!Jwi\~12-

on. Richard G.
drews
United States District Judge

I

I
,
j

f

9

'

I

i
f
I
I

t