Biddle v. Morgan et al

Filing 22

MEMORANDUM ORDER Denying as Moot the Letter/Motion for Injunctive Relief (D.I. 11 ). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 6/19/2013. (nms)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE WAYNE BIDDLE, Plaintiff, v. : Civ. No. 13-343-RGA OFFICER JONES, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM ORDER Plaintiff Wayne Biddle, a former inmate within the Delaware Department of Correction, filed a Complaint (D. I. 2) on March 1, 2013, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. On May 23, 2013, while incarcerated, plaintiff filed a letter/motion (D.I. 11) construed as a motion for injunctive relief to stop Defendants from threatening, harassing and/or retaliating against him as a result of filing the instant lawsuit. On June 17, 2013, Plaintiff advised the court that he is no longer incarcerated. (See D.l. 20.) Inasmuch as Plaintiff is no longer incarcerated, injunctive relief may not issue. "The relevant inquiry is whether the movant is in danger of suffering irreparable I harm at the time the preliminary injunction is to be issued." Sl Handling Sys., Inc. v. Heisley, 753 F.2d 1244, 1264 (3d Cir. 1985). Because Plaintiff is no longer an incarcerated individual, it is impossible for him to suffer irreparable with regard to the issues he raises in his letter/motion seeking injunctive relief. ~ THEREFORE, at Wilmington this \1day of June, 2013, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's letter/motion for injunctive relief (D.I. 11) is DENIED as moot. f I f

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?