AVM Technologies LLC v. Intel Corporation

Filing 687

MEMORANDUM ORDER re 645 MOTION for Reconsideration of the Court's Order on AVM's Motion in Limine No. 2. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 4/30/2017. (nms)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

AVM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
Plaintiff;

v.

Civil Action No. 15-33-RGA

INTEL CORPORATION,
Defendant.
MEMORANDUM ORDER
I have considered AVM's Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's Order on AVM's
Motion in Limine No. 2 Precluding References to "Class Test Data." (D.I. 645). I have a
response from Intel. (D.1. 656).
AVM says it is seeking limited reconsideration, to wit, "if Intel opens the door by
criticizing ... AVM's experts concerning the quality of the data on which AVM relies, AVM
should be able [to disclose the existence of the Class Test Database, and that it was not produced
after request.]" (D.1. 645 at 3). Intel responds that it "has never criticized Dr. Hassoun for
failing to consider the Class Test Data, nor will it do so at trial." (D.1. 656 at 2).
I am not positive this issue even matters now, but on the assumption that it does, there is
nothing for me to decide at this point. If Intel "opens the door" at trial such that A VM thinks the
existence of the Class Test Database has become relevant, it is free to bring up the issue outside
the presence of the jury, but I have difficulty thinking that AVM's proposal is not the relitigation
of the discovery dispute, which I have already stated is not going to occur.

Entered this

P

day of April, 2017.