In re: Prommis Holdings LLC
Filing
4
Recommendation that Bankruptcy Appeal be withrawn from mandatory mediation. Signed by Judge Mary Pat Thynge on 8/24/15. (kjk)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
In re: IN RE: PROMMIS HOLDINGS LLC
Debtors.
C. A. No. 15-704-GMS
Bankruptcy Case No. 13-10551 (BLS)
BAP No 15-44
EDWARD TIDWELL,
Appellant,
'!""···.
~
("")
c:;;
v.
-r•1
c:::t
or-
Cil:::O
:?:a
~~
c:::
CJ)
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC,
r;!==
;;;~2!
N
.:::-
'"1(/)1C:'-if'1
~
Appellees,
Recommendation
f.!:.1,.. ,
:5?E1
::::
~~
w
en
C.J'J
-<:::
:;::,O
);>C"J
At~
-:.i
At Wilmington this 24th day of August, 2015.
WHEREAS, pursuant to paragraph 2(a) of the Procedures to Govern
Mediation of Appeals from the United States Bankruptcy Court for this District dated
September 11, 2012, the court conducted an initial review, which included a review of
the decision of the Bankruptcy Court date July 30, 2015 which granted Appellees'
motion to dismiss Appellant's adversary proceeding, upon which this appeal is based,
to determine the appropriateness of mediation in this matter;
WHEREAS, as a result of the above screening process, mediation at this
stage would not be a productive exercise, a worthwhile use of judicial resources nor
warrant the expense of the process.
The Memorandum Order of the Honorable Brendan L. Shannon determined that
Appellant's claims exist outside of bankruptcy under the law and as evidenced by
Appellant's prior filings in a state court in California, and do not relate to, do not arise
under and do not arise in bankruptcy, and thus the Bankruptcy Court did not have
jurisdiction over Appellant's claim. The court further noted that Appellant's motion
seeking leave to file his late claim was denied from which no appeal was taken. The
issues in this matter clearly are purely legal, and therefore are not conducive to
mediation.
THEREFORE, IT IS RECOMMENDED that, pursuant to paragraph
2(a) Procedures to Govern Mediation of Appeals from the United States Bankruptcy
Court for this District and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), this matter be withdrawn from the
mandatory referral for mediation. Through this Recommendation, the parties are
advised of their right to file objections to this Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1 )(B), FED. R. CIV. P. 72(a) and D. DEL. LR 72.1. Any objections to this
Recommendation shall be filed within fourteen (14) days after being served with the
same, and limited to five (5) pages,. Any response must be filed within fourteen (14)
days after service of objections and is limited to five (5) pages. The parties are further
directed to the Court's Standing Order in Pro Se matters for Objections Filed under FED.
R. C1v. P. 72 dated October 9, 2013, a copy of which is available on the court's website,
www.ded.uscourts.gov.
Local counsel are obligated to inform out-of-state counsel of this Order.
Isl Mary Pat Thynge
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?