Walsh II v. The English Monarchy et al
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 9/29/16. (sar)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
JOHN R. WALSH, II,
Plaintiff,
Civ. No. 16-502-LPS
v.
THE ENGLISH MONARCHY, et al.,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM
I.
BACKGROUND
On July 13, 2016, the Court denied Plaintiff's request to proceed in jo171Ja pauperis. (See D.I. 6)
Plaintiff moves for reconsideration on the grounds that other courts have granted him in jo171Ja
pattperis status. (D.I. 8)
II.
LEGAL STANDARDS
The purpose of a motion for reconsideration is to "correct manifest errors of law or fact or
to present newly discovered evidence." Max's Seqfood Cqfe ex rel. Lou-Ann, Inc. v. Quinteros, 176 F.3d
669, 677 (3d Cir. 1999). A motion for reconsideration is the "functional equivalent" of a motion to
alter or amend judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). See Jones v. Pittsburgh Nat'/ Corp., 899 F.2d 1350,
1352 (3d Cir. 1990) (citing f
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?