Noble v. Cerino

Filing 5

MEMORANDUM. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 8/3/2016. (cna)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: ) ) ) Misc. Action No. 16-177 -SLR ) ) THOMAS E. NOBLE, Movant. THOMAS E. NOBLE, Plaintiff, v. JOHN A. CERINO and anyone else colluding with him, Defendant. ) } } ) ) ) } } ) MEMORANDUM At Wilmington this j~day of August, 2016, having considered movant's motion for reconsideration (D.I. 4); IT IS ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration (D.I. 7) is denied, for the following reasons: 1. Motions for Reconsideration. Movant moves for reconsideration of the June 29, 2016 memorandum and order (D.1. 2, 3) that denied his motion to ·file. Movant seeks reconsideration on the grounds that the undersigned is ethically barred from movant's cases and erred in denying the motion. 2. The purpose of a motion for reconsideration is to "correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence." Max's Seafood Cafe ex rei. Lou- Ann, Inc. v. Quinteros, 176 F.3d 669, 677 (3d Cir. 1999). "A proper Rule 59(e) motion ... must rely on one of three grounds: (1) an intervening change in controlling law; (2) the availability of new evidence; or (3) the need to correct a clear error of law or fact or to prevent manifest injustice. Lazaridis v. Wehmer, 591 F.3d 666, 669 (3d Cir. 2010) (citing N. River Ins. Co. v. C/GNA Reinsurance Co., 52 F.3d 1194, 1218 (3d Cir. 1995). 3. After carefully considering the motion, the court finds that movant has failed to demonstrate grounds that warrant reconsideration of the court's June 29,2016 memorandum and order. Therefore, the motion will be denied. 4. Conclusion. For the above reasons, the court will deny the motion for reconsideration. (0.1.4) A separate order shall issue. UNITED STAT S DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?