Donato v. Berryhill

Filing 23

ORDER ADOPTING 22 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; granting in part and denying in part 14 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 18 Motion for Summary Judgment. The case is remanded with instructions to: 1) Address t he excluded limitations in the hypothetical question posed to the VE as discussed in this Recommendation; and 2) Re-assess Plaintiff's residual functional capacity and her ability to return to past relevant work. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 9/9/2019. (nmf)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE MARGARITA 0. DONATO, Plaintiff, v. ) ) ) ) ) Civ. No. 18-476-CFC-SRF ) 1 , ANDREW SAUL Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ORDER At Wilmington this 'it day of September, 2019, having considered the Report and Recommendation issued by Chief United States Magistrate Mary Pat Thynge on July 22, 2019, and upon the expiration of the time allowed for objections pursuant to Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure with no objections having been filed; IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Magistrate Judge Thynge's Report and Recommendation (D.I. 22) is adopted. 2. Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment (D.I. 14) is granted in part and 1 Andrew Saul was sworn in as Commissioner of Social Security on June 17, 2019 to succeed Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill. Berryhill was the original party in this case. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d) and 42 U.S.C. ยง405(g), Andrew Saul was automatically substituted as the Defendant in this action. denied in part. 3. Defendant's motion for summary judgment (D.I. 18) is granted in part and denied in part. 4. The case is remanded with instructions to: 1) Address the excluded limitations in the hypothetical question posed to the VE as discussed in this Recommendation; and 2) Re-assess Plaintiffs residual functional capacity and her ability to return to past relevant work.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?