Ecke v. Mallinckrodt plc
Filing
11
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Thomas L. Ambro on 8/21/2023. (twk)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
IN RE: MALLINCKRODT PLC, et al.,
:
Chapter 11
:
Debtors.
:
Case No. 20-12522-JTD
___________________________________________________________
MARIA ECKE,
Appellant,
:
:
:
:
Civ. No. 23-00076-TLA
v.
:
:
MALLINCKRODT PLC, et al.,
:
:
Appellees.
:
__________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
August 21, 2023
Wilmington, Delaware
AMBRO, Circuit Judge, sitting by designation.
Appellant Maria Ecke, proceeding pro se, brings an appeal challenging the
Bankruptcy Court’s order (the “Confirmation Order”) 1 confirming the Chapter 11
reorganization plan filed by Mallinckrodt, plc and its affiliates. Because this Court lacks
jurisdiction to hear the appeal, I must dismiss it.
Courts “have an independent obligation to determine whether subject-matter
jurisdiction exists, even in the absence of a challenge from any party.” In re Caterbone,
640 F.3d 108, 111 (3d Cir. 2011). This duty keeps courts from exercising power they do
not have. In the Third Circuit, the rules that set the time within which a bankruptcy appeal
must be taken—set out in Bankruptcy Rule 8002 and incorporated in 28 U.S.C.
§ 158(c)(2)—are jurisdictional. See id. at 111-12 (“Because Section 158 [] specifies the
time within which an appeal must be taken—i.e., ‘in the time provided by Rule 8002’—
that requirement is jurisdictional”). So, if an appellant does not comply with those
requirements, a District Court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction to hear his or her appeal
and must dismiss it.
Under Bankruptcy Rule 8002(a), a notice of appeal must be filed with the
bankruptcy clerk within 14 days after entry of the order being appealed or 14 days after the
last timely filed appeal, whichever is later. 2 Here, the Confirmation Order was entered in
March 2022, and the last timely appeal was filed in that same month. Ms. Ecke’s notice
See D.I. 1, Attachment 4 “Findings of Fact and Conclusion[s] of Law on Appeal”
The time set in Rule 8002(a) can be extended if a motion described in subparagraph (b)
is timely filed, but no such motions were.
1
2
2
of appeal was not filed until January 18, 2023, and so she is much too late. Nor can she
save her appeal under Bankruptcy Rule 8002(d)—which allows a bankruptcy judge to
extend the time to file an appeal in some circumstances—because she has failed to request
an extension within the time periods prescribed by that rule, and in any case it does not
apply to appeals of confirmation orders under 11 U.S.C. § 1129.
Thus, I must dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Because this Court lacks
jurisdiction, Ms. Ecke’s related Motion for Miscellaneous Relief and Motion to Appoint
Counsel are each denied as moot.
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?