MCKESSON CORPORATION, et al v. IRAN, THE ISLAMIC RE, et al

Filing 982

ORDER, For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is this 27th day of March, 2013, hereby ORDERED that plaintiffs' Motion for Entry of Final Judgment 961 , 969 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; and it is fu rther ORDERED that judgment be entered in favor of plaintiffs and against the defendants in the amount of $40,551,000.40; and it is further ORDERED that plaintiffs are entitled to seek additional fees and costs incurred after June 30, 2012 and u ntil the conclusion of this litigation and are hereby authorized to submit a further application for such fees and costs consistent with this Judgment; and it is further ORDERED that in accordance with U.S.C. 1961, post-judgment interest shall accru e on all amounts awarded to plaintiffs pursuant to this Judgment as of the date hereoff; and it is further ORDERED that defendants' July 30, 2012 motion 960 is DENIED as MOOT. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Richard J. Leon on 3/27/2013. (see order) (kc )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

MCKESSON CORP. et al.,
Plaintiffs,

v.
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civ. Action No. 82-220 (RJL)

~RDER
(Marchz2. 2013) [Dkts. ##960, 961, 969]

For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is this

~
~day ofMarch, 2013, hereby
ORDERED that plaintiffs' Motion for Entry of Final Judgment [Dkts. ##961,
969] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; and it is further

ORDERED that judgment be entered in favor of the plaintiffs and against the
defendants in the amount of$40,551,000.40; and it is further

ORDERED that plaintiffs are entitled to seek additional fees and costs incurred
after June 30, 2012 and until the conclusion of this litigation and are hereby authorized to
submit a further application for such fees and costs consistent with this Judgment; and it
is further

ORDERED that in accordance with U.S.C. § 1961, post-judgment interest

shall accrue on all amounts awarded to plaintiffs pursuant to this Judgment as of the date
hereof; and it is further
ORDERED that defendants' July 30, 2012 motion [Dkt. #960] is DENIED as
MOOT.
SO ORDERED.

CHARDJ.L 0~
United States District Judge