PIGFORD, et al v. VENEMAN, et al

Filing 2049

ORDER denying the Wises' Motion to Compel Written Consent to Op Out 2002 ; denying the Wises' Motion for Contempt and to Enforce the Pigford Consent Decree 2003 ; denying as moot the Wises' Emergency Motion for Preliminary Injunction Against Foreclosure 2006 ; denying as moot the Wises' Emergency Motion for an Order on Dkt. 2003 2031 ; denying the Wises' Motion for a Declaratory Judgment 2037 ; denying the Bateses' Motion 2017 ; denying the Bateses' Objec tion 2018 ; denying Parker's Motion for a Declaratory Judgment 2040 ; and denying Cowtown's Motion to Intervene and Freeze the Remaining Funds 2048 . Signed by Judge Paul L. Friedman on September 15, 2016. Associated Cases: 1:97-cv-01978-PLF, 1:98-cv-01693-PLF (MA)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
___________________________________
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
TOM VILSACK, Secretary,
)
United States Department of Agriculture, )
)
Defendant.
)
___________________________________ )
)
CECIL BREWINGTON et al.,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
TOM VILSACK, Secretary,
)
United States Department of Agriculture, )
)
Defendant.
)
___________________________________ )
TIMOTHY PIGFORD et al.,

Civil Action No. 97-1978 (PLF)

Civil Action No. 98-1693 (PLF)

ORDER
For the reasons explained in the accompanying Opinion issued this same day,
it is hereby
ORDERED that the Wises’ Motion to Compel Written Consent to Op Out
[Dkt. 2002] is DENIED; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Wises’ Motion for Contempt and to Enforce the
Pigford Consent Decree [Dkt. 2003] is DENIED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Wises’ Emergency Motion for Preliminary
Injunction Against Foreclosure [Dkt. 2006] is DENIED as moot; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Wises’ Emergency Motion for an Order on
Dkt. 2003 [Dkt. 2031] is DENIED as moot; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Wises’ Motion for a Declaratory Judgment
[Dkt. 2037] is DENIED; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Bateses’ Motion [Dkt. 2017] is DENIED; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Bateses’ Objection [Dkt. 2018] is DENIED; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that Parker’s Motion for a Declaratory Judgment
[Dkt. 2040] is DENIED; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that Cowtown’s Motion to Intervene and Freeze the
Remaining Funds [Dkt. 2048] is DENIED. This is a final appealable order. See FED. R. APP. P.
4(a).
SO ORDERED.

/s/_______________________
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN
United States District Judge
DATE: September 15, 2016

2