Filing 118

Download PDF
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION Doc. 118 Case 1:98-cv-01232-CKK Document -1 Filed 02/12/08 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : v. : CR. NO. 07-131-01 (JR) JAMES BECTON : DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR INTERIM COMPENSATION The defendant, through undersigned counsel, pursuant to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and the provisions of the Criminal Justice Act, respectfully requests that this honorable court approve interim compensation in this matter. In support of his request, the defendant states the following: 1. The defendant stands indicted in a multi-count indictment in which he along with numerous other co-defendants is charged in a narcotics conspiracy that has allegedly operated for more than ten years. The evidence is voluminous and includes more than 50,000 intercepted telephone calls. 2. The court has already ruled that the matter is complex and extended in approving the government's request for an extension of the speedy trial time period. Counsel believes that the approval of the included order is necessary to avoid the financial hardship that might accompany uncompensated representation in a lengthy matter. WHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, the defendant respectfully requests that the court grant his motion and authorize the payment of interim compensation to all counsel in this matter. Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:98-cv-01232-CKK Document -1 Filed 02/12/08 Page 2 of 2 Respectfully submitted, ___________________________________ Edward C. Sussman, No. 174623 Suite 900 - South Building 601 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington, D.C.. 20004 (202) 737-7110 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT a copy of the foregoing was served electronically on all interested parties this 4th day of August, 20007. __________________________________ Edward C. Sussman 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?