Filing 132

Download PDF
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION Doc. 132 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JAMES MASON 717 Ingraham Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20012, Plaintiff, v. DAVITA INC. 601 Hawaii Street El Segundo, CA 90245, Defendant. ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 06-1319 (RMC) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DAVITA INC.'S INDEX OF ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COUNT I OF THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Minh N. Vu (Bar No. 444305) EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C. 1227 25th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037 Tel: (202) 861-1841 Fax: (202) 861-3541 Joseph T. Ortiz (admitted pro hac vice) Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. 1875 Century Park East, Suite 500 Los Angeles, CA 90067-2506 (310) 557-9542 (310) 553-2165 (fax) Counsel for Defendant DaVita Inc. August 21, 2007 DC:1075950v1 Dockets.Justia.com INDEX OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION Note: DaVita Exhibits 1-9 were filed with DaVita's Motion for Summary Judgment on Count I of the Second Amended Complaint. Declaration of Randy Larson dated August 17, 2007 E-mail by Rosalva DePillo dated February 22, 2006 transmitting Job Posting Form for Maryland Pharmacy Services Representative and Job Posting Form for same Additional excerpts from deposition transcript of Joshua Golomb Additional excerpts from deposition transcript of Kimberly Easlon Unpublished decisions Alvarez v. Motorola, No. 97-17214, 1999 WL 65208 (9th Cir. Feb. 9, 1999) Lamb v. Boeing Co., 213 F. App'x 175 (4th Cir. 2007) EXHIBIT NUMBER 1-9 10 11 12 13 14 DC:1075950v1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 21st day of August, 2007, a copy of DaVita Inc.'s Index of Additional Exhibits was served through the Court's Electronic Court Filing system to counsel listed below: David A. Branch Law Office of David A. Branch 1825 Connecticut Avenue, NW Suite 690 Washington, D.C. 20009 ____/s/ Minh N. Vu___________________ Minh N. Vu DC:1075950v1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?