UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION

Filing 706

ORDER denying ProComp Motion to Intervene [], but permitting limited participation as amicus curiae. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on February 28, 2002. (lcckk1)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION

Doc. 706

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendant. Civil Action No. 98-1232 (CKK)

ORDER Before the Court is ProComp's motion to intervene, and in the alternative, to participate as amicus curiae. For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is this 28th day of February, 2002, hereby ORDERED that ProComp's motion to intervene is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that ProComp's motion to participate as amicus curiae is GRANTED in part. ProComp shall be permitted to assist the Court in the role of amicus curiae in the following manner: · · ProComp may file a reply memorandum, as described in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, not exceeding twenty-five pages; If ProComp prefers that the Court review its amicus reply brief prior to the Tunney Act hearing, it shall file its brief with the Court and deliver a courtesy copy to chambers not later than 5 p.m. on March 4, 2002. Otherwise, ProComp shall file its reply brief not later than 10 a.m. on March 11, 2002; ProComp may present not more than ten minutes of oral argument during the Tunney Act hearing; and it is further

·

ORDERED that, if ProComp chooses to present argument to the Court at the upcoming

Dockets.Justia.com

Tunney Act hearing, it shall identify the individual who will be addressing the Court not later than 10 a.m. on March 4, 2002. SO ORDERED.

____________________________ COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY United States District Judge