UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Filing
906
STATUS REPORT Supplemental by MICROSOFT CORPORATION. (Rule, Charles)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Doc. 906
Case 1:98-cv-01232-CKK Document 906
Filed 02/16/10 Page 1 of 5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendant. Civil Action No. 98-1232 (CKK) Next Court Deadline: March 5, 2010 Joint Status Report
SUPPLEMENTAL STATUS REPORT ON MICROSOFT'S COMPLIANCE WITH THE FINAL JUDGMENTS Microsoft hereby files its Monthly Supplemental Status Report regarding its compliance with the Final Judgments. I. Technical Documentation A. Technical Documents
Microsoft added seven new technical documents to the MCPP documentation set in January 2010. These documents are for new protocols implemented in the next version of Windows Home Server, which will be released later this year. B. Microsoft's Progress in Resolving Technical Documentation Issues ("TDIs") through January 31, 2010
The current status of TDIs identified in the MCPP documentation through January 31, 2010, is noted in the chart below.1
1
The December TDI numbers reported in this chart differ slightly from the numbers provided in the previous Joint Status Report because the dynamic nature of tracking TDIs in multiple databases occasionally results in categorization and exact TDI closure dates changing after the previous reporting period.
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 1:98-cv-01232-CKK Document 906
Filed 02/16/10 Page 2 of 5
As of 12/31/2009 Priority 1 TDIs Submitted by the TC Submitted this period Closed this period Outstanding Priority 2 TDIs Submitted by the TC Submitted this period Closed this period Outstanding Priority 3 TDIs Submitted by the TC Submitted this period Closed this period Outstanding TC Submitted TC Closed TC Outstanding TDIs Identified by Microsoft Ident ified this period Closed this period Microsoft Outstanding TDIs Identified by Licensees Ident ified this period Closed this period Licensees Outstanding
2
Period Ended 01/31/2010 171 151 525 263 393 688 169 203 424 603 747 1637
505
818
458
1781
428
272 328 372
20
7 9 18
TDIs Identified by TC in Overview/Reference Materials Ident ified this period Closed this period Overview Outstanding Total Outstanding
6 2235
5 1 10 2037
2
In most cases, licensees do not open TDIs themselves. Licensees generally ask Microsoft questions about the documentation. Most questions do not result in any TDIs. In some cases, questions from licensees result in a TDI being filed by the Microsoft employees involved in answering the licensees' questions. In these circumstances, Microsoft categorizes the TDI as a licensee TDI.
Case 1:98-cv-01232-CKK Document 906
Filed 02/16/10 Page 3 of 5
II.
Technical Documentation Testing and Licensee Support Microsoft's testing of the Windows 7 documentation is progressing and is expected to be
completed in approximately June 2010. Microsoft continues to make various resources available to assist licensees in using the technical documentation. In addition, Microsoft's Interoperability Lab remains open and available for use by licensees. Microsoft held a plug-fest focusing on Active Directory Protocols from January 18-21, 2010, in Redmond, Washington. Developers from four companies (Cisco Systems, Inc., SUN Microsystems, Napera Networks, and F5 Networks) attended the plug-fest. III. Technical Documentation Team Staffing Robert Muglia, the President for Microsoft's Server and Tools Business, continues to manage the documentation effort along with additional senior product engineering team managers. Approximately 500 Microsoft employees and contingent staff are involved in work on the MCPP technical documentation. Given the substantial overlap between the MCPP and the European Work Group Server Protocol Program, all of these individuals' work relates to both programs or is exclusive to the MCPP. Of these, approximately 228 product team engineers and program managers are actively involved in the creation and review of the technical content of the documentation, including periodic work on TDI resolution as well as developing new content for the next version of Windows Client and Windows Server. Because of varying areas of expertise, not all of these product team employees are working on the documentation at any given time. For example, many of the MCPP documents currently do not have any associated TDIs. In other months, these same product teams may have multiple TDIs to resolve and/or additional content to draft and spend most or all of their time on projects relating to the protocol documentation.
Case 1:98-cv-01232-CKK Document 906
Filed 02/16/10 Page 4 of 5
In addition, there are approximately 28 full-time employees and approximately 61 contingent staff working as technical writers, editors, and production technicians. Additionally, as the protocol testing effort continues, approximately 40 full-time employees and approximately 110 contingent and vendor staff work as software test designers, test engineers, and test architects. Microsoft will continue to apply the resources necessary to ensure compliance with the Final Judgments. Significant attention to and involvement in the technical documentation and the MCPP extend through all levels of the Microsoft organization and draw upon the resources of numerous product engineering, business, technical, and legal groups, as well as company management. Dated: February 16, 2010 Respect fully submitted, FOR DEFENDANT MICROSOFT CORPORATION /s/ CHARLES F. RULE CHARLES F. RULE (DC BAR No. 370818) JONATHAN S. KANTER (DC BAR No. 473286) Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP 700 Sixth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 (202) 862-2420 BRADFORD L. SMITH ERICH D. ANDERSEN DAVID A. HEINER, JR. Microsoft Corporation One Microsoft Way Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 936-8080
Case 1:98-cv-01232-CKK Document 906
Filed 02/16/10 Page 5 of 5
STEVE L. HOLLEY RICHARD C. PEPPERMAN II Sullivan & Cromwell LLP 125 Broad Street New York, NY 10004 (212) 558-4000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?