UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALL FUNDS ON DEPOSIT AT

Filing 1412

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 1263 Pavel Lazarenko's motion for summary judgment on the United States' allegations related to the Ylorex Establishments account. Signed by Judge Paul L. Friedman on February 1, 2021. (lcan)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ALL ASSETS HELD AT BANK JULIUS ) Baer & Company, Ltd., Guernsey ) Branch, account number 121128, in the ) Name of Pavlo Lazarenko et al., ) ) Defendants In Rem. ) ____________________________________) Civil Action No. 04-0798 (PLF) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On May 1, 2020, following this Court’s opinion striking Pavel Lazarenko’s claim to the Balford Trust, Mr. Lazarenko filed a motion for summary judgment [Dkt. No. 1263] on the United States’ allegations related to the Ylorex Establishments account in Liechtenstein. In his motion, Mr. Lazarenko argues that the government cannot meet its burden of proof at trial to show that the Ylorex Establishments account is connected to unlawful activity. See Dkt. No. 1263 at 3. On June 5, 2020, the United States filed its sealed opposition [Dkt. No. 1296], along with a redacted version of its opposition [Dkt. No. 1293]. Mr. Lazarenko filed his reply [Dkt. No. 1320] on July 20, 2020. Before the parties completed briefing on Mr. Lazarenko’s summary judgment motion, the United States filed a motion [Dkt. No. 1275] to strike Mr. Lazarenko’s claim to the defendant assets held in the name of Beranco Engineering Establishments, Ylorex Establishments, and Tanas AG in Liechtenstein, and all assets traceable thereto (collectively, “Liechtenstein Accounts”). The United States argued that Mr. Lazarenko lacked constitutional, statutory, and prudential standing to assert a claim to those assets. See Dkt. No. 1275-1 at 11. Mr. Lazarenko opposed the motion [Dkt. No. 1319] and moved for leave to amend his claim [Dkt. No. 1322]. The United States filed a reply and opposition [Dkt. No. 1338] to the motion to amend and Mr. Lazarenko filed his reply [Dkt. No. 1347] in support of the motion to amend. On December 23, 2020, this Court granted the United States’ motion to strike Mr. Lazarenko’s claim to all assets held in the Liechtenstein Accounts. United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius Baer & Company, Ltd., Civil Action No. 04-0798, 2020 WL 7640213, at *1 (D.D.C. Dec. 23, 2020). The Court concluded that Mr. Lazarenko lacked constitutional and statutory standing to contest forfeiture of the Liechtenstein Accounts. Id. at *10, *13. The Court also denied as futile Mr. Lazarenko’s motion to amend his claim. Id. at *14. “[S]tanding . . . is jurisdictional.” Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343, 349 n.1 (1996). “It is well established, [therefore], that before a federal court can consider the merits of a legal claim, the person seeking to invoke the jurisdiction of the court must establish the requisite standing to sue.” Whitmore v. Arkansas, 495 U.S. 149, 154 (1990). Because this Court has concluded that Mr. Lazarenko lacks constitutional and statutory standing to assert a claim to the Liechtenstein Accounts, including the Ylorex Establishments account, the Court does not have jurisdiction to consider the merits of Mr. Lazarenko’s motion for summary judgment on the Ylorex Establishments account. 2 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Mr. Lazarenko’s motion for summary judgment [Dkt. No. 1263] on the United States’ allegations related to the Ylorex Establishments account in Liechtenstein is DENIED. SO ORDERED. /s/ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN United States District Judge DATE: February 1, 2021 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?