AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY v. GOOGLE, INC.

Filing 8

Attachment 1
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by GOOGLE, INC.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Klaus Hamm# 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Lutzker, Arnold)

Download PDF
AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY v. GOOGLE, INC. Doc. 8 Att. 1 Case 1:04-cv-02131-RBW Document 8-2 Filed 02/03/2005 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY 1155 16th Street NW Washington , DC 20036 Plaintiff Case No. 1: 04CV02131 RBW GOOGLE We. 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway Mountain View, California 94043 Defendant. DECLARATION OF KLAUS H. HAMM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE 346669. Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:04-cv-02131-RBW Document 8-2 Filed 02/03/2005 Page 2 of 2 In support of the motion of Arnold P. Lutzker that I be admitted pro hac vice in the above-captioned matter, I, KLAUS H. HAMM, declare that: My full name is Klaus Hemmingway Hamm. I am an associate with the firm ofKeker & Van Nest LLP and practice out of the firm s office at 710 Sansome Street, San Francisco, CA 94111. My office telephone number is (415) 391-5400. I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of California and have also been admitted to the following bars: United States District Court for the Northern District of California 2003; United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2003; and California Supreme Court 2003. I certify that I have not been disciplined by any bar. Within the last two years, I have never been admitted pro hac vice in this Court. I do not engage in the practice of law from an office located in the District of Columbia. For the reasons stated above, I respectfully request that this honorable Court grant Arnold P. Lutzker s motion and that I be admitted pro hac vice in the above-captioned action. Executed on February 2, 2005 , at San Francisco, California. I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. KL US . HAMM 346669.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?