STEINBUCH v. CUTLER

Filing 64

ORDER denying 47 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel, denying as moot 49 Defendant's Motion to Extend Discovery, granting in part and denying in part 62 Defendant's Motion to Deem Rule 36 Requests Admitted, Motion to Compel Discovery, and Alternative Motion to Preclude Evidence, and recommending denial of plaintiff's request to revoke pro hac vice admission of defense counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola on 12/08/06. (lcjf1, )

STEINBUCH v. CUTLER

Doc. 64

Case 1:05-cv-00970-PLF-JMF

Document 64

Filed 12/08/2006

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) ROBERT STEINBUCH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 05-970 (PLF/JMF) ) JESSICA CUTLER and ) ANA MARIE COX, ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) ORDER In accordance with the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. This Court will not recommend revocation of defense counsel's pro hac vice status; and it is further ORDERED that 2. No document of discovery shall be filed in this case for any purpose without prior explicit permission granted by this Court; and it is further ORDERED that 3. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel [#47] is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that 4. Defendant's Motion to Extend Discovery [#49] is DENIED AS MOOT; and it is further ORDERED that 5. Defendant's Motion to Deem Rule 36 Requests Admitted, Motion to Compel Discovery, and Alternative Motion to Preclude Evidence [#62] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 1:05-cv-00970-PLF-JMF

Document 64

Filed 12/08/2006

Page 2 of 2

SO ORDERED.

______________________________ JOHN M. FACCIOLA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Dated: