ZAID et al v. BUSH et al
ORDER directing respondents to file additional information. See text of the Order for details. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 1/14/09. (lcjdb1)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
WALEED SAID BN SAID ZAID, Petitioner, v. GEORGE W. BUSH, et al., Respondents. Civil Action No. 05-1646 (JDB)
ORDER In  respondents' motion for an extension of time, respondents represented to the Court that they have produced petitioner's statements in accordance with section I.E.1 of the Court's Case Management Order. Petitioner now argues that respondents have not produced the statements themselves, but instead have produced only some summaries of petitioner's statements. Upon consideration of  petitioner's motion to compel compliance with section I.E.1 of the Court's Case Management Order, and the entire record herein, it is hereby ORDERED that respondents shall inform the Court, in writing, by not later than 5:00 p.m. on January 16, 2009, whether respondents possess any of the following materials with regard to the "statements" of petitioner that they have produced: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Audio recordings of statements made by petitioner; Video recordings of statements made by petitioner; Transcripts of statements made by petitioner; Contemporaneous notes taken during any interrogation of petitioner; or Records or reports of petitioner's statements made by persons other than the persons who prepared the summaries of petitioner's statements already produced.
If any such materials exist and are in the possession of respondents, then respondents
shall explain briefly why such materials have not been produced in response to the Court's Case Management Order requiring production of "all statements, in whatever form, made or adopted by the petitioner that the government relies on to justify detention." See  Zaid Case Management Order (Dec. 22, 2008) at § I.E.1(2). SO ORDERED.
/s/ JOHN D. BATES United States District Judge Date: January 14, 2009
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?