ZAID et al v. BUSH et al

Filing 182

ORDER granting 179 180 petitioner's motions for extension of time and to modify the date of the previously-scheduled status conference. See text of the Order for details. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 3/24/09. (lcjdb1)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WALEED SAID BN SAID ZAID, Petitioner, Civil Action No. 05-1646 (JDB) v. BARACK H. OBAMA, et al., Respondents. ORDER Before the Court are petitioner's motions for an extension of time to file a traverse and to reschedule the status hearing presently scheduled for April 8, 2009.1 Upon consideration of those motions, and the entire record herein, it is hereby ORDERED that the motions are GRANTED and that the due dates set forth in the Court's February 24, 2009 order are amended as follows: 1. The Court will hold a status conference in this matter on April 2, 2009, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 8; 2. Respondents shall produce discovery pursuant to section I.E.2 of the Case Management Order ("CMO") by not later than April 14, 2009 or as otherwise specified in the order issued today addressing discovery under section I.E.2; 3. 4. Petitioner shall file his traverse by not later than April 21, 2009; The parties shall meet and confer and file a status report pursuant to section I.H of The Court has today issued orders resolving two of petitioner's other motions: a motion for a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition and a motion for discovery pursuant to section I.E.2 of the Case Management Order in this case. 1 the CMO by not later than April 28, 2009; 5. A status hearing will be held pursuant to section I.H. of the CMO on May 4, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 8, at which point the Court will set the briefing schedule for the parties' motions for judgment on the record. SO ORDERED. /s/ JOHN D. BATES United States District Judge Date: March 24, 2009 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?