VANMOOR v. ALEXA INTERNET, INC.

Filing 5

ANSWER to Counterclaim by ARTHUR VANMOOR.(Sibley, Montgomery)

Download PDF
VANMOOR v. ALEXA INTERNET, INC. Doc. 5 Case 1:06-cv-00051-RMU Document 5 Filed 03/06/2006 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DIST RICT OF COLUMBIA ARTHUR VANMOOR, Case. No.:06-00051 RMU Plaintiff, vs. ALEXA INTERNET Defendant. _______________________________________/ Plaintiff, Arthur Vanmoor, answers Defendant, Alexa Internet, Inc.'s counterclaim and admits, denies, and alleges as follows: 1. 2. 3. 4. Denied. Admitted. Denied. Denied except admits that at one time Plaintiff was listed in the Whois Database as AN S W E R TO COUNTERCLAIMS OF DE F E N DA N T a registrant of the subject websites. 5. 6. 7. themselves. 8. Denied except admits the pleadings, orders and transcripts of the referenced lawsuit Denied except admits that Plaintiff was sued as alleged. Denied except admits that there is such an order which speaks for itself. Denied except admits the pleading and orders in the referenced lawsuit speak for speaks for itself. 9. Denied except admits the pleadings, orders and transcripts of the referenced lawsuit speaks for itself. 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:06-cv-00051-RMU Document 5 Filed 03/06/2006 Page 2 of 2 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. privilege. 15. 16. 17. 18. Denied accept admits that the relevant docket sheets speak for themselves. Denied accept admits that the relevant docket sheets speak for themselves. Denied. Denied. Plaintiff is unable to answer this allegation as to do so would violate the settlement Plaintiff re-states its answer to paragraphs 1 -14. Denied. Denied. Denied. Plaintiff demands a Jury Trial on all issues so triable. MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY Counsel for Plaintiff 50 West Montgomery Avenue, Suite B-4 Rockville, Maryland 20850 (202) 508-3699 (Voice) (202) 478-0371 (Telefax) By:__________________________ Montgomery Blair Sibley D.C. Bar #464488 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?