ESTATE OF JOHN BUONOCORE III et al v. GREAT SOCIALIST PEOPLE'S LIBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA, et al

Filing 1

COMPLAINT against GREAT SOCIALIST PEOPLE'S LIBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA, LIBYAN INTERNAL SECURITY, LIBYAN EXTERNAL SECURITY, MU'AMMAR AL-QADHAFI, ABDALLAH AL-SANUSI, IBRAHAIM AL-BISHARI, SIRYAN ARAB REPUBLIC, SYRIAN AIR FORCE INTELLIGENCE, MUHAMMED AL KHULI (Filing fee $ 350) filed by SALVATORE FERRIGNO, ESTATE OF GRACE MALAND, TIM MALAND, ESTATE OF CHARLES SHINN, ESTATE OF JEANNE SHINN, JEANETTE SWEIS, ESTATE OF MICHAEL SWEIS, ESTATE OF AIDA SWEIS, ESTATE OF ELENA TOMMARELLO, ARMANDO PEPENELLA, ESTATE OF JOHN BUONOCORE III, BRUNO PEPENELLA, FRANCESCO ZERILLI, NANCY GAGE, CECIL BUONOCORE, ESTATE OF DON MALAND, ELLEN MALAND, JANE MALAND, MARK MALAND, ESTATE OF EINAR MALAND, JOHN BUONOCORE, II, TODD BUONOCORE.(tg, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Estate of John Buonocore III by and through Cecil Buonocore 521 Blackgates Road Wilmington, DE 19803-2448 and Cecil Buonocore 521 Blackgates Road Wilmington, DE 19803-2448 and John Buonocore II 521 Blackgates Road Wilmington, DE 19803-2448 and Todd Buonocore 921 Lovering Avenue Wilmington, DE 19806 and Salvatore Ferrigno 37 Sibelius Road Newton, PA 18940 and Nancy Gage 160 Pinto Drive Edwards, CO 81632 and The Estate of Don Maland By and through Mark Maland 1010 Church Street Elizabeth City, NC 27909-4608 : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : COMPLAINT and Ellen Maland 4906 N. 29th Street Arlington, VA 22207 and Jane Maland 2 Cedar Hill Drive Durham, NC 27713 and Mark Maland 1010 Church Street Elizabeth City, NC 27909-4608 and The Estate of Einar Maland By and through Mark Maland 1010 Church Street Elizabeth City, NC 27909-4608 and The Estate of Grace Maland By and through Mark Maland 1010 Church Street Elizabeth City, NC 27909-4608 and Tim Maland 2500 East Second Street Reno, NV 89595 and The Estate of Charles Shinn By and through Beverly Mignerey 42015 North Club Pointe Drive Anthem, AZ 85086 : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 2 and The Estate of Jeanne Shinn By and through Beverly Mignerey 42015 North Club Pointe Drive Anthem, AZ 85086 and Jeanette Sweis 4300 W. 91st Place Oak Lawn, IL 60453-1964 and The Estate of Michael Sweis By and through Jeanette Sweis 4300 W. 91st Place Oak Lawn, IL 60453-1964 and The Estate of Aida Sweis By and through Jeanette Sweis 4300 91st Place Oak Lawn, IL 60453-1964 and The Estate of Elena Tommarello By and through Bruno Pepenella 636 East McMurry Road McMurry, PA 15317 and Armando Pepenella 119 Pier D Naples, FL 34113 and Bruno Pepenella 636 East McMurry Road McMurry, PA 15317 : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 3 and Francesco Zerilli 1959 E. Jefferson Ave. Suite 407 Detriot, MI 48207 Plaintiffs, v. Great Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya a/k/a LIBYA Tripoli, LIBYA and Libyan Internal Security a/k/a al-‘Amn al-Dhakhili Bab-al-Azizyeh Assur Road Tripoli, LIBYA and Libyan External Security a/k/a al-‘Amn al-Khariji Bab-al-Azizyeh Assur Road Tripoli, LIBYA and Mu’ammar al- Qadhafi Supreme Leader of the Great Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Tripoli, LIBYA and Major Abdallah al-Sanusi Chief, Libyan Internal Security Bab-al-Azizyeh Assur Road : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 4 Tripoli, LIBYA : : and : : Ibrahaim al-Bishari : Chief, Libyan External Security : Bab-al-Azizyeh : Assur Road : Tripoli, LIBYA : : and : : SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC : Damascus, SYRIA : : and : : Syrian Air Force Intelligence : Kafar Susa Roundabout : Damascus, SYRIA : : and : : General Muhammed Al Khuli : Chief, Syrian Air Force Intelligence : Kafar Susa Roundabout : Damascus, SYRIA : : : Defendants : ....................................: COMPLAINT FOR COMPENSATORY AND PUNITIVE DAMAGES Plaintiffs bring this action pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1602, et seq. This action arises out of the injuries and deaths of John Buonocore III, Frederick Gage, Don Maland, Charles Shinn, and Elena Tommarello, and the injuries of Salvatore Ferrigno, Mark Maland, Jeanette Sweis, Michael Sweis, Jeanne Shinn and Francesco Zerilli, all of which resulted from the terrorist attack at the Leonardo da Vinci Airport, a/k/a Fiumicino Airport (“Rome Airport”) in Rome, Italy on December 27, 1985 (“Rome 5 Airport Attack”), which targeted the TWA and El Al check-in counters and was carried out simultaneously and in conjunction and coordination with a similar attack at the Schwechat Airport outside of Vienna, Austria (“Vienna Airport Attack”). Both the Rome Airport Attack and the Vienna Airport Attack were carried out by certain individuals acting under the instruction and/or control of the Defendants and/or utilizing the funding and support provided by the governments of Libya and Syria as state sponsors of terrorism and others who support terrorism, and to which actions the Defendants rendered material support and direct involvement. Plaintiffs state in support of their Complaint and allege as follows: JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. Jurisdiction over the subject matter of this case arises under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1330 (a), 1331, 1332(a)(2) and 1605. 2. Defendants Great Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya (hereinafter “Libya”), al ‘Amn-al Dhakhili (hereinafter “Libyan Internal Security Agency”), al-‘Amn al Khariji (hereinafter “Libyan External Security Agency”), Syrian Arab Republic (hereinafter “Syria”), and the Syrian Air Force Intelligence are subject to suit in the courts of the United States as sponsors of and participants in the ANO’s activities pursuant to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, as amended, (hereinafter “FSIA”) 28 U.S.C. § 1605(a)(7), and related statutes. 3. Defendants General Muhammad al-Khuli, Mu’ammar al-Qadhdhafi, Major Abdallah al-Sanusi, and Ibrahaim al-Bishari are subject to suit in the courts of the United States pursuant to the FSIA, 28 U.S.C. § 1605(a)(7), and related statutes. 6 4. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(f)(4), which provides, in pertinent part, that a civil action against a foreign state may be brought in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. 5. Actions for wrongful death, personal injury and related torts perpetrated by foreign state sponsors of terrorism acting by and through their officials, employees and agents within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1605(a)(7) are unique causes of action arising out of the federal counter-terrorism statute(s) and are controlled by federal law. THE PARTIES A. The Plaintiffs 6. This action is brought by the Plaintiffs, by and through their counsel, in the individual capacity of each Plaintiff and, as appropriate, in the capacity of each as representative of the estate, for their own benefit, for the benefit of each particular estate, and for the benefit and on behalf of all those legally entitled to assert a claim under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1602 et seq., and state common law and statutory law. The Buonocore Family 7. Plaintiff The Estate of John Buonocore III, is represented in this action by and through Cecil Buonocore, the Administrator of said Estate. John Buonocore III was, at the time of the acts alleged and throughout his lifetime, an American citizen and, at the time of his death, a citizen and resident of the State of Delaware. John Buonocore III was, at all pertinent times alleged herein, a victim of “torture” who was murdered by an act of “extrajudicial killing” as defined in Section 3 of the Torture Victims Protection Act of 1991 (hereinafter “TVPA”), 28 U.S.C. 1350. He suffered “personal injury” and 7 “death” as the result of Defendants’ actions and terrorist acts and activities as described in 28 U.S.C. § 1605(a)(7). Plaintiff The Estate of John Buonocore III, by and through its Administrator, Cecil Buonocore, can sue and be sued in this Court. 8. Plaintiffs Cecil Buonocore and John Buonocore II at all times relevant hereto are and were the natural parents of John Buonocore III. Cecil Buonocore and John Buonocore II are citizens of the United States of America who reside in the State of Delaware. Plaintiffs Cecil Buonocore and John Buonocore II can sue and be sued in this Court. 9. Plaintiff Todd Buonocore at all times relevant hereto is and was the brother of Plaintiff John Buonocore III. Plaintiff Todd Buonocore is a citizen of the United States of America who resides in the State of Delaware. Plaintiff Todd Buonocore can sue and be sued in this Court. Salvatore Ferrigno 10. Plaintiff Salvatore Ferrigno is currently a United States citizen who resides in the State of Pennsylvania. Salvatore Ferrigno was, at all pertinent times alleged herein, a victim of “torture” as defined in the TVPA, 28 U.S.C. § 1350. He suffered “personal injury” caused by the Defendants’ actions, terrorist acts and activities as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 1605(a)(7). Plaintiff Salvatore Ferrigno can sue and be sued in this Court. Nancy Gage 11. Plaintiff Nancy Gage is a citizen of the United States of America who resides in the State of Colorado. Plaintiff Nancy Gage brings this action in her individual capacity as the sister of Frederick Gage and in her capacity as the person to whom the 8 amount recovered for his wrongful death belongs. Frederick Gage was, at the time of the acts alleged and throughout his lifetime, an American citizen and, at the time of his death, a resident and citizen of the State of Wisconsin. Frederick Gage was, at all pertinent times alleged herein, a victim of “torture” who was murdered by an act of “extrajudicial killing” as defined in Section 3 of the TVPA, 28 U.S.C. § 1350. He suffered “personal injury” and “death” resulting from Defendants’ actions, terrorist acts and activities as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 1605(a)(7). Plaintiff Nancy Gage can sue and be sued in this Court. The Maland Family 12. Plaintiff The Estate of Don Maland, is represented in this action by and through Mark Maland. Don Maland was, at the time of the acts alleged and throughout his lifetime, an American citizen and, at the time of his death, a resident and citizen of the State of Florida. At all pertinent times alleged herein, Don Maland was a victim of “torture” who was murdered by an act of “extrajudicial killing” as defined in Section 3 of the TVPA, 28 U.S.C. § 1350. He suffered “personal injury” and “death” resulting from Defendants’ actions, terrorist acts and activities as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 1605(a)(7). Plaintiff the Estate of Don Maland, by and through Mark Maland, can sue and be sued in this Court. 13. Plaintiff Mark Maland was, at the time of the acts alleged and throughout his lifetime, an American citizen who resides in the State of North Carolina. At all pertinent times alleged herein, Mark Maland was a victim of “torture” as defined in the TVPA, 28 U.S.C. § 1350. He suffered “personal injury” resulting from Defendants’ actions, terrorist acts and activities as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 1605(a)(7). Plaintiff Mark 9 Maland is and was at all times relevant hereto the brother of Don Maland. Mark Maland is a citizen of the United States of America who resides in the State of North Carolina. Plaintiff Mark Maland can sue and be sued in this Court. 14. Plaintiff The Estate of Einar Maland is represented in this action by Mark Maland. Einar Maland is and was at all relevant times hereto the father of Don Maland and Mark Maland. Einar Maland was, at the time of the acts alleged and throughout his lifetime, an American citizen and, at the time of his death, a resident and citizen of the State of Florida. Plaintiff The Estate of Einar Maland, by and through Mark Maland, can sue and be sued in this Court. 15. Plaintiff The Estate of Grace Maland is represented in this action by Mark Maland, Administrator of said estate. Grace Maland is and was at all relevant times hereto the mother of Don Maland and Mark Maland. Grace Maland was, at the time of the acts alleged and throughout her lifetime, an American citizen and, at the time of her death, a resident and citizen of the State of North Carolina. Plaintiff The Estate of Grace Maland, by and through its Administrator, Mark Maland, can sue and be sued in this Court. 16. Plaintiff Ellen Maland is and was at all times relevant hereto the sister of Don Maland and Mark Maland. Ellen Maland is a citizen of the United States of America who resides in the State of Virginia. Plaintiff Ellen Maland can sue and be sued in this Court. 17. Plaintiff Jane Maland is and was at all times relevant hereto the sister of Don Maland and Mark Maland. Jane Maland is a citizen of the United States of America 10 who resides in the State of North Carolina. Plaintiff Jane Maland can sue and be sued in this Court. 18. Plaintiff Tim Maland is and was at all times relevant hereto the brother of Don Maland and Mark Maland. Tim Maland is a citizen of the United States of America who resides in the State of Nevada. Plaintiff Tim Maland can sue and be sued in this Court. The Shinn Family 19. Plaintiff The Estate of Charles Shinn, is represented in this action by Beverly Mignerey, the Personal Representative of said estate. Charles Shinn was, at the time of the acts alleged and throughout his lifetime, an American citizen and, at the time of his death, a resident and citizen of the State of Colorado. Charles Shinn was, at all pertinent times alleged herein, a victim of “torture” and “extrajudicial killing” as defined in Section 3 of the TVPA, 28 U.S.C. § 1350. He suffered “personal injury” and “death” resulting from Defendants’ actions, terrorist acts and activities as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 1605(a)(7). Charles Shinn was at all times relevant hereto the husband of Jeanne Shinn. Plaintiff the Estate of Charles Shinn, by and through its Personal Representative, Beverly Mignerey, can sue and be sued in this Court. 20. Plaintiff The Estate of Jeanne Shinn, is represented in this action by Beverly Mignerey as the Personal Representative of said estate. Jeanne Shinn was, at the time of the acts alleged and throughout her lifetime, an American citizen and, at the time of her death, a resident and citizen of the State of Colorado. Jeanne Shinn was, at all pertinent times alleged herein, a victim of “torture” as defined in Section 3 of the TVPA, 28 U.S.C. § 1350. She suffered “personal injury” resulting from Defendants’ actions, terrorist acts 11 and activities as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 1605(a)(7). Jeanne Shinn was at all times relevant hereto the wife of Charles Shinn. Plaintiff the Estate of Jeanne Shinn, by and through its Personal Representative, Beverly Mignerey, can sue and be sued in this Court. The Sweis Family 21. Plaintiff Jeanette Sweis is and was, at the time of the acts alleged and throughout her lifetime, an American citizen who resides in the State of Illinois. At all pertinent times alleged herein, Jeanette Sweis was a victim of “torture” as defined in the TVPA, 28 U.S.C. § 1350. She suffered “personal injury” resulting from Defendants’ actions, terrorist acts and activities as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 1608(a)(7). Plaintiff Jeanette Sweis can sue and be sued in this Court. 22. Plaintiff The Estate of Michael Sweis, is represented in this action by Jeanette Sweis, Executor of said Estate. Michael Sweis was, at all relevant times alleged herein and throughout his lifetime, an American citizen and, at the time of his death, a resident and citizen of the State of Illinois. Michael Sweis was, at all pertinent times alleged herein, a victim of “torture” as defined in the TVPA, 28 U.S.C. § 1350. He suffered “personal injury” resulting from Defendants’ actions, terrorist acts and activities as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 1608(a)(7). Plaintiff The Estate of Michael Sweis, by and through its Executor, Jeanette Sweis, can sue and be sued in this Court. 23. Plaintiff The Estate of Aida Sweis, is represented in this action by Jeanette Sweis, Executor of said Estate. Aida Sweis is and was at all relevant times hereto the mother of Jeanette Sweis and the wife of Michael Sweis. Aida Sweis was, at the time of the acts alleged and throughout her lifetime, an American citizen and, at the time of her 12 death, a resident and citizen of the State of Illinois. Plaintiff The Estate of Aida Sweis, by and through its Executor, Jeanette Sweis, can sue and be sued in this Court. The Tommarello Family 24. Plaintiff The Estate of Elena Tommarello is represented in this action by Bruno Pepenella. Elena Tommarello was, at all relevant times alleged herein, an American citizen and, at the time of her death, a resident and citizen of the State of Pennsylvania. Elena Tommarello was, at all pertinent times alleged herein, a victim of “torture” and “extrajudicial killing” as defined in the TVPA, 28 U.S.C. § 1350. She suffered “personal injury” and “death” resulting from Defendants’ actions, terrorist acts and activities as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 1608(a)(7). Plaintiff The Estate of Elena Tommarello, by and through Bruno Pepenella, can sue and be sued in this Court. 25. Plaintiff Armando Pepenella is and was at all times relevant hereto the son of Elena Tommarello. Armando Pepenella is a United States citizen who resides in the State of Florida. Plaintiff Armando Pepenella can sue and be sued in this Court. 26. Plaintiff Bruno Pepenella is and was at all times relevant hereto the son of Elena Tommarello. Bruno Pepenella is a United States citizen who resides in the State of Pennsylvania. Plaintiff Bruno Pennsylvania can sue and be sued in this Court. Francesco Zerilli 27. Plaintiff Francesco Zerilli is a permanent resident of the United States who currently resides in the State of Michigan. Francesco Zerilli was, at all pertinent times alleged herein, a victim of “torture” as defined in the TVPA, 28 U.S.C. § 1350. He was shot during the attack, suffering “personal injury” caused by the Defendants’ actions, 13 terrorist acts and activities as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 1605(a)(7). Plaintiff Francesco Zerilli can sue and be sued in this Court. B. The Defendants 28. Defendant Libya is a foreign state that has been designated a state sponsor of terrorism pursuant to § 6(j) of the Export Administration Act of 1979, 50 U.S.C. App. § 2405, § 620(A) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, 22 U.S.C. § 2371, and section 40 of the Arms Export Control Act, since December 29, 1979. Libya at all times pertinent to this action, provided material support and resources to the Abu Nidal Organization (“ANO” or “Abu Nidal Organization”), and directly participated in its terrorist activities. The ANO, at all times pertinent to this action, has operated in, among other places, Libya, Iraq, Lebanon, and Syria, carrying out both militant terrorist operations and a campaign of terrorism. This terrorist campaign includes, but is not limited to, attacks in 20 countries, which have killed or injured almost 900 persons. Targets included persons in the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Israel, and also moderate Palestinians, the Palestine Liberation Organization (“PLO”) and various other people and countries. Libya, through its actions is and/or has been a sponsor of the ANO, within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1605(a)(7) and Public Law 104-208, amended 28 U.S.C. § 1605(a)(7) as a note (hereinafter “Flatow Amendment”), by providing it with funding, direction, material support, encouragement, safe haven and training for its terrorist activities. 29. Defendant Syria is a foreign state that has been designated and remains designated as a state sponsor of terrorism pursuant to section 60 of the Export Administration Act of 1979, 50 U.S.C. App. § 2405, section 620(A) of the Foreign 14 Assistance Act of 1961, 22 U.S.C. § 2371, and section 40 of the Arms Export Control Act, since December 29, 1979. Syria, at all times pertinent to this action, provided material support and resources to the ANO. Abu Nidal, at all times pertinent to this action, and to the present, has operated in, among other places, Libya, Iraq, Lebanon, and Syria, carrying out both militant terrorist operations and a campaign of terrorism. This terrorist campaign includes, but is not limited to, attacks in 20 countries, which have killed or injured almost 900 persons. Targets included persons in the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Israel, as well as moderate Palestinians, the PLO and various persons and other countries. Syria, through its actions, is and/or has been a sponsor of ANO, within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1605 (a)(7) and the Flatow Amendment, by providing it with funding, direction, support, encouragement, safe haven and/or training for its terrorist activities. 30. Defendant Libyan Internal Security (“LISO”) is one of the Libyan intelligence services through which Libya sponsored Abu Nidal, which caused the terrorist acts described below. 31. Defendant Libyan External Security (“LESO”) is one of the Libyan intelligence services through which Libya sponsored Abu Nidal, which caused the terrorist acts described below. 32. Defendant Mu’ammar al Qadhafi is the leader of Libya and performed acts within the scope of his office, which caused the terrorist acts described below. 33. Defendant Major Abdallah al-Sanusi was the head of the Libyan Internal Security Agency and performed acts within the scope of his office, which caused the terrorist acts described below. 15 34. Defendant Ibrahaim al-Bishari was the head of the Libyan External Security Agency and performed acts within the scope of his office, which caused the terrorist acts described below. 35. Defendant Syrian Air Force Intelligence is the Syrian intelligence services through which Syria sponsored Abu Nidal, which caused the terrorist acts described below. 36. Defendant General Muhammed al-Khuli was the chief of the Syrian Air Force Intelligence and performed acts within the scope of his office, which caused the terrorist acts described below. 37. Defendants General Muhammad al-Khuli, Mu’ammar al-Qadhafi, Major Abdallah al-Sanusi, and Ibrahaim al-Bishari performed acts within the scope of their offices, which caused the extrajudicial killings and personal injuries resulting from the act of terrorism described herein. Accordingly, said Defendants are jointly and severally liable to Plaintiffs. 38. Defendants Libya, and Syria as well as the Syrian Air Force Intelligence, the Libyan External Security Agency, Libyan Internal Security Agency, General Muhammad al-Khuli, Mu’ammar al-Qadhdhafi, Major Abdallah al-Sanusi, and Ibrahaim al-Bishari are directly and/or vicariously responsible for the actions of their co-defendants because they sponsored the Abu Nidal Organization. Accordingly, Defendants are jointly and severally liable to Plaintiffs. 16 THE ROME AIRPORT ATTACK 39. On December 27, 1985, shortly after 9 a.m., four terrorists from the Abu Nidal Organization, with the aid, support, encouragement and involvement of the various named Defendants, stormed the International Flights terminal of the Leonardo Da Vinci Airport in Rome, Italy, brandishing Kalashnikov submachine rifles and type F1 hand grenades, which they had smuggled into the airport. As is described more particularly below, the Defendants provided direct and indirect material support for the planning and operation of this terrorist attack. 40. Before commencing their attack, the terrorists divided themselves into two pairs of attackers, so that both pairs could enter simultaneously through two different entrances and head for their intended targets, the check-in counters for TWA and El Al Airlines. 41. One pair emerged from a tunnel that lead to the terminal entrance labeled “35-36-37-38” in a burst of gunfire and exploding hand grenades, aiming for the passengers waiting at the TWA and El Al check-in counters. 42. The other pair entered through the terminal entrance marked “31-32-33-34” and opened fire on passengers standing in front of a bar/restaurant near the counters. 43. When the terrorists paused, allowing for their identification amidst the passengers’ confusion and distress, airport security agents for El Al Airlines fired shots aimed for the terrorists, killing three of them. 44. Unfortunately, two other individuals were also wounded by the security officers. 17 45. Ultimately 13 people were killed and 75 wounded in the Rome Airport Attack, among them women, children and the elderly. 46. A simultaneous attack was executed by ANO terrorists employing the same strategy at the Schwechat Airport in Vienna, Austria, killing an additional three people and wounding 30. 47. On the same day that the Rome and Vienna airport attacks were carried out, December 27, 1985, the ANO claimed responsibility for both massacres. 48. The sole surviving terrorist in the Rome Airport Attack, Khaled Ibrahim Mahmood, Khaled Ibrahim Mahmood, a/k/a Al Hasan, Mohamed Sorhan Abdallah, Mohamed Weled Hussein Al Abdallah, Issa Suleiman Abdallah, or Ahmed Hussein Al Ajlan (“Khaled”) was arrested and tried in Italy in connection with the massacre at Rome’s Leonardo da Vinci Airport. 49. On February 12, 1988, he was convicted by an Italian court of committing an act of terrorism, in addition to other related offenses, and sentenced to 30 years imprisonment and 1.5 million Italian lire in fines. 50. At his trial, Khaled admitted to being a member of the Abu Nidal Organization since the age of 11, and to participating in several ANO terrorist attacks, including the grenade attack on Rome’s Café de Paris on September 10, 1985, during which the terrorists used the same type F1 grenades used in the Rome Airport Attack, the Vienna Airport Attack, and the hijacking of Egypt Air Flight 648 on November 23, 1985, all of which were directly supported by the government of Libya, and supported by the government of Syria. 18 51. Khaled also described in detail the planning and execution of the Rome Airport Attack. 52. He and the other members of his hit team were trained with the terrorists who conducted the Vienna Airport Attack at an ANO training camp in Syrian-controlled Lebanon. 53. During this training, he learned of a plan to conduct terrorist attacks at airports and tourist attractions frequented by Americans and Israelis, including an airport in Madrid, Spain. 54. Khaled was unavailable for the Madrid attack, but did not learn of anticipated role in the Rome Airport Attack until he arrived in Italy. 55. Upon conclusion of his training in Syria, Khaled met ANO leaders in charge of foreign operations and training at an apartment in Damascus, Syria, which served as the ANO’s departure base for foreign operations. 56. He received airline tickets for travel to Rome as well as fake Moroccan passports before departing the foreign operations base. 57. Libya provided the terrorists who conducted the Rome and Vienna airport attacks with weapons and passports. 58. Upon arriving in Rome, Khaled met with ANO contacts Al Hamieda Rashid, a/k/a Mohamed Fouad (“Fouad”) and Abu Mithkal (“ANO contacts”) who provided him and his hit team members with weapons and operational instructions. 59. Khaled and his hit team learned of the objective of their attack, and were instructed to target as many Americans and Jews as possible, to take their passports and to hold them hostage. 19 60. The night before the attack, December 26, 1985, Khaled and another terrorist met Fouad and turned over their fake Moroccan passports. 61. The three went to Leonardo da Vinci Airport at approximately 11 p.m. to do a final check of the property, and Fouad identified the TWA and El Al counters. 62. On the morning of December 27, 1985, Khaled met his hit team and Fouad, each with the exception of Fouad carrying one or more suitcases holding smuggled weapons and personal belongings. 63. They arrived at the airport at seven minutes before 9 a.m. and commenced the attack. 64. The United States Department of State, Bureau of Public Affairs, Office of the Historian, in its report of Significant Terrorist Incidents, 1961- 2003, lists the Rome Airport Attack and the Vienna Airport Attack on December 27, 1985 as terrorist attacks that were conducted by the Abu Nidal Organization. 65. Background Information on Foreign Terrorist Organizations, released by the Office of Counterterrorism, of the United States Department of State, indicates that the ANO has received considerable support, including safe haven, training, logistical assistance, and/or financial aid from the states of Libya and Syria, each being a Defendant herein. 66. The instances of physical violence and/or death inflicted upon John Buonocore III, Salvatore Ferrigno, Frederick Gage, Don Maland, Mark Maland Charles Shinn, Jeanne Shinn, Elena Tommarello, Jeanette Sweis, Michael Sweis and Francesco Zerilli were undertaken intentionally upon them for the purpose of furthering the 20 objectives of the governments of Libya and Syria and the terrorist objectives of the ANO, and such acts therefore constitute “torture” as defined in the TVPA. DEFENDANTS’ SPONSORSHIP AND SUPPORT FOR THE ABU NIDAL ORGANIZATION 67. The government of Libya, and also separately the government of Syria, sponsored and supported the Abu Nidal Organization, a/k/a Black June, Black September, the Fatah Revolutionary Council, the Arab Revolutionary Council, the Arab Revolutionary Brigades, and/or the Revolutionary Organization of Socialist Muslims, a known terrorist organization which was headed by Sabri Al Bana a/k/a Abu Nidal, prior to and at the time of the Rome and Vienna airport attacks. 68. Despite Libya’s recent attempts to rejoin the laws of nations and forgo a path of terrorism, this has not always been the case. Since Defendant Mu’ammar alQadhafi seized political control of Libya by military coup in 1969, Libya has balked at international norms, abusing diplomatic privileges and using terrorism as an instrument of its own foreign policy. 69. Libya has used threats of terrorism, its material support and operational assistance for terrorist attacks, and actual terrorist violence as a means of political opposition, specifically targeting the United States and Israel. 70. Libya supported radical terrorist groups generally by providing terrorist training outside of Libya and by operating terrorist training camps in Tripoli in order to train, instruct, support and educate terrorists on the use of explosive devices, hijacking, assassination, and various commando and guerrilla techniques, in addition to abusing its diplomatic privileges by, among other things, storing arms and explosives at its diplomatic establishments. 21 71. Throughout the 1980s, both directly and through material support and resources provided to terrorist organizations such as ANO, Libya engaged in a concerted campaign of terrorist activities directed at the United States, Europe, Israel and their allies. 72. Libya’s involvement in terrorism was particularly robust from early 1984 through several years after the Rome and Vienna airport attacks, which were committed on December 27, 1985. 73. Also during 1985, Libya was directly involved and/or provided material support for numerous terrorist attacks in addition to the Rome and Vienna airport attacks, including but not limited to the following: a. The ANO hijacking of Egypt Air Flight 648 on November 23, 1985, for which Libya provided passports and moved weapons in diplomatic pouches to the hijackers, allowing the terrorists to travel and to preposition their weapons for use in the attack; b. Also in November 1985, a team of four Libyan agents was arrested in Egypt in an attempt to assassinate former Libyan Prime Minister Bakoush, an enemy of the Qadhafi regime; c. The September 1985 ANO terrorist attack at Rome’s Café de Paris, during which the ANO terrorists threw grenades provided by Libya at the restaurant, injuring 38 tourists, including American citizens; d. Also in September 1985, a Libyan diplomat smuggled approximately 100 letter bombs addressed to Tunisian journalists into Tunisia. 22 Several of the bombs exploded, injuring two postal workers and causing Tunisia to sever diplomatic relations with Libya; e. In the United States in May 1985, a Libyan diplomat at the United Nations was declared persona non grata, and 16 non-official Libyans were subpoenaed to appear before a U.S. grand jury in connection with a plot to kill dissidents in several different states; f. In April 1985 in the former West Germany, Libyans were arrested at two separate murder scenes in which Libyans murdered a Moroccan citizen resident and an anti-Qadhafi Libyan student who had been the target of the Libyan regime for at least two years; and g. In Austria in February 1985 the former Libyan Ambassador to Austria, who resigned from his post under the Qadhafi regime in disgust, was assassinated outside of his home in Vienna. 74. The Abu Nidal Organization was, at all times relevant hereto, among the most dangerous and violent of the terrorist organizations supported by Libya and Syria, engaging in indiscriminate violence against bystanders, including children. 75. As of February 1989, the ANO conducted terrorist attacks in more than 20 countries on three continents, killing more than 300 people and injuring at least 650. 76. Libya provided substantial material support and sponsorship to the ANO, as well as providing logistical support for the ANO’s specific terrorist operations. 77. The substantial material support to and sponsorship of the ANO by the government of Libya included, but was not limited to, assisting and/or providing the following: 23 a. funds, b. facilities, c. airline tickets, d. free and unobstructed entry into, safe haven in, and exit from Libya by members of ANO, e. terrorist training in Libyan camps, f. use of the privilege of Libya’s “diplomatic pouch”, g. use of Libya’s diplomatic freight privileges, h. official documents of all kinds, including passports, i. provision of uniforms, tanks and BM021 multiple rocket launchers, j. weapons, including hand grenades used in various ANO attacks, and k. actual operational assistance in pre-positioning of people and supplies for the conduct of terrorist operations. 78. During the year 1985 alone, the leader of the ANO met with Qadhafi at least twice, in addition to meeting separately with Qadhafi’s chief lieutenant, Abd alSalam Jallud, and conducting an interview from Tripoli. 79. Following these meetings, ANO leadership began to relocate to Tripoli from Syria. 80. With specific regard to the coordinated, simultaneous Rome and Vienna airport attacks, the government of Libya supported this operation by, among other things, providing the ANO terrorists who conducted the attacks with weapons and passports, which allowed the terrorists to travel. 24 81. The hand grenades used in the Rome Airport Attack and the Vienna Airport Attack, as well as in the ANO terrorist attacks on the Café de Paris and Egypt Air Flight 648 bear the same markings as those found on four Libyan terrorists, who were arrested on April 18, 1986, while approaching the US officers’ club in Ankara, Turkey, carrying the hand grenades, which they obtained from the Libyan People’s Bureau. 82. The United States Central Intelligence Agency therefore concluded that “[t]he similarities between the grenades seized in 1985 [in the Rome Airport Attack, the Vienna Airport Attack, the Café de Paris attack and the Egypt Air Flight 648 hijacking] and those captured in Turkey corroborate previous reporting that Tripoli provides operational support for the Abu Nidal group and uses its diplomatic installations to pass weapons to terrorists.” 83. In the wake of the Rome and Vienna airport attacks, on January 2, 1986, Qadhafi threatened to “pursue U.S. citizens in their country and streets” in retaliation for any action taken by the United States in response to Libya’s involvement in these terrorist attacks. 84. A Libyan news agency applauded the Rome and Vienna airport attacks as “heroic operations carried out by the sons of the martyrs of Sabra and Shatila . . . .” 85. The sponsorship by the government of Syria included, among other things, the provision of training in Syrian sponsored ANO terrorist training camps, military and general intelligence, travel documents, safe haven and free passage in and through Syrian controlled territory. 25 86. Syria further provided general material support to the ANO by providing the ANO with funds, travel documents, training support and protection at several facilities, including those located in the Bekaa Valley. 87. The sole surviving hijacker of the Rome Airport Attack, Khaled Ibrahim Mahmood, confirmed that he and the other three members of his hit team, in addition to the terrorists who carried out the Vienna Airport Attack, were trained in Syrian-occupied Lebanon by Syrians. 88. Syria also permitted ANO operatives to maintain an apartment in Damascus, where ANO terrorists would regularly stay before departing on terrorist missions. 89. It was customary for ANO terrorists to stay in this apartment during the organization phase of a given terrorist attack, and remain there until departing to conduct the attack. 90. Khaled confirmed that he stayed in this departure base prior to leaving for Italy to commit the Rome Airport Attack. 91. Had the attack not taken place as planned, or had Khaled escaped, he would have called the ANO’s apartment in Damascus which served as the departure base for foreign operations to receive further instructions. 92. The United States Department of State, Office of the Secretary of State, Ambassador-At-Large for Counter-Terrorism, concluded that the ANO conducted the Rome Airport Attack and the Vienna Airport Attack, classifying these terrorist attacks as among the most brutal examples of ANO violence. 26 93. The Defense Intelligence Agency of the United States Department of Defense, and other intelligence agencies of the United States government, determined that the Abu Nidal Organization was sponsored by the governments of Libya and Syria. 94. The provision of material support for the ANO, a known terrorist organization, by the government of Libya and the government of Syria, acting directly and by and through their individual governmental representatives as named in the Complaint, and by other representatives of the government, constitute violations of applicable and numerous United States laws, thereby rendering the government of Libya, the government of Syria, and their individual governmental representatives named as Defendants herein, jointly and severally liable for their illegal acts and deeds, all to the damage of the Plaintiffs, and each of them, thereby entitling each to Judgment against each of the Defendants, jointly and severally, as prayed for in the within Complaint.. COUNT I – BATTERY (Under State Common Law) (John Buonocore III, Salvatore Ferrigno, Don Maland, Mark Maland, Charles Shinn, Jeanne Shinn, Jeanette Sweis, Michael Sweis, Elena Tommarello and Francesco Zerilli) 95. Plaintiffs repeat, reallege and incorporate by reference those facts and allegations set forth in all the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 96. On December 27, 1985, members of the ANO willfully, violently and forcefully committed terrorist acts at the International Flights terminal of the Leonardo da Vinci Airport in Rome, Italy with the express purpose of inflicting severe pain and suffering and death. John Buonocore III, Salvatore Ferrigno, Don Maland, Mark Maland, Charles Shinn, Jeanne Shinn, Jeanette Sweis, Michael Sweis, Elena Tommarello and 27 Francesco Zerilli were present at the terminal and were accordingly seized against their will. The willful, wrongful and intentional acts of Abu Nidal were sponsored by Libya, and Syria, as well as the Syrian Air Force Intelligence, the Libyan External Security Agency, and Libyan Internal Security Agency constituted a battery upon the person(s) of John Buonocore III, Salvatore Ferrigno, Don Maland, Mark Maland, Charles Shinn, Jeanne Shinn, Jeanette Sweis, Michael Sweis, Elena Tommarello and Francesco Zerilli, causing injury to them as set forth above. 97. Defendants General Muhammad al-Khuli, Mu’ammar al-Qadhdhafi, Major Abdallah al-Sanusi, and Ibrahaim al-Bishari performed acts within the scope of their offices which sponsored the ANO ’s terrorist activities, including but, not limited to the Rome Airport Attack. 98. As a direct and proximate result of the willful, wrongful and intentional acts of the ANO members, whose acts were sponsored by Libya and Syria, as well as the Syrian Air Force Intelligence, the Libyan External Security Agency, Libyan Internal Security Agency, General Muhammad al-Khuli, Mu’ammar al-Qadhdhafi, Major Abdallah al-Sanusi, and Ibrahaim al-Bishari, Plaintiffs John Buonocore III, Salvatore Ferrigno, Don Maland, Mark Maland, Charles Shinn, Jeanne Shinn, Jeanette Sweis, Michael Sweis, Elena Tommarello and Francesco Zerilli were injured in that they endured extreme mental anguish, physical injury and pain and suffering, all to their damage. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs, and each of them, on behalf of the estate and heirs of John Buonocore III, Don Maland, Charles Shinn, Jeanne Shinn, Michael Sweis and Elena Tommarello, and on behalf of Salvatore Ferrigno, Mark Maland, Jeanette Sweis and 28 Francesco Zerilli, demands that judgment be entered, jointly and severally, against the Defendants for the damages they suffered, including, but not limited to, pain, suffering, mental anguish, loss of life and/or limb, permanent and disabling disfigurement and physical injuries as well as pecuniary losses, in the amount of FIFTY MILLION ($50,000,000.00) US Dollars for each of them, on this Count I, and their costs expended, including attorneys fees. COUNT II – ASSAULT (Under State Common Law) (John Buonocore III, Salvatore Ferrigno, Don Maland, Mark Maland, Charles Shinn, Jeanne Shinn, Jeanette Sweis, Michael Sweis, Elena Tommarello and Francesco Zerilli) 99. Plaintiffs repeat, reallege and incorporate by reference those facts and allegations set forth in paragraphs in all the forgoing paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 100. During the Rome Airport Attack, the ANO terrorists intentionally and willfully put John Buonocore III, Salvatore Ferrigno, Don Maland, Mark Maland, Charles Shinn, Jeanne Shinn, Jeanette Sweis, Michael Sweis, Elena Tommarello and Francesco Zerilli in fear for their lives and apprehension of harm and injury as a direct result of the terrorists’ actions in brandishing and firing weapons and explosives, and the physical and mental abuse they inflicted upon them. 101. As a direct and proximate result of the willful, wrongful and intentional acts of the ANO members, whose acts were sponsored by Libya and Syria, as well as the Syrian Air Force Intelligence, the Libyan External Security Agency, Libyan Internal Security Agency, General Muhammad al-Khuli, Mu’ammar al-Qadhdhafi, Major 29 Abdallah al-Sanusi, and Ibrahaim al-Bishari, Plaintiffs John Buonocore III, Salvatore Ferrigno, Don Maland, Mark Maland, Charles Shinn, Jeanne Shinn, Jeanette Sweis, Michael Sweis, Elena Tommarello and Francesco Zerilli were injured in that they endured extreme mental anguish, physical injury and pain and suffering, all to their damage. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs, and each of them, on behalf of the estate and heirs of John Buonocore III, Don Maland, Charles Shinn, Jeanne Shinn, Michael Sweis and Elena Tommarello, and on behalf of Salvatore Ferrigno, Mark Maland, Jeanette Sweis and Francesco Zerilli, demand that judgment be entered, jointly and severally, against the Defendants for the damages they suffered, including, but not limited to, pain, suffering, mental anguish, and pecuniary losses, in the amount of ONE HUNDRED MILLION ($100,000,000.00) US Dollars for each of them, on this Count II, and their costs expended, including attorney’s fees. COUNT III – INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, INCLUDING SOLATIUM (Under the Flatow Amendment and State Common Law) (As to All Plaintiffs) 102. Plaintiffs repeat, reallege and incorporate by reference those facts and allegations set forth in all of the forgoing paragraphs as if fully set forth. 103. The acts of terrorizing and holding John Buonocore III, Salvatore Ferrigno, Frederick Gage, Don Maland, Mark Maland, Charles Shinn, Jeanne Shinn, Jeanette Sweis, Michael Sweis, Elena Tommarello and Francesco Zerilli captive and each and all of the acts set forth above, constituted extreme and outrageous conduct with the intent to inflict emotional distress upon them and emotional distress, including solatium, upon 30 members of their families. Further these acts were undertaken for the purpose of causing mental duress and suffering, including solatium, upon the members of their families. 104. As a direct result and proximate result of the willful, wrongful and intentional acts of the ANO, whose acts were sponsored by Libya and Syria as well as the Syrian Air Force Intelligence, the Libyan External Security Agency, Libyan Internal Security Agency, General Muhammad al-Khuli, Mu’ammar al-Qadhdhafi, Major Abdallah al-Sanusi, and Ibrahaim al-Bishari, John Buonocore III, Salvatore Ferrigno, Frederick Gage, Don Maland, Mark Maland, Charles Shinn, Jeanne Shinn, Jeanette Sweis, Michael Sweis, Elena Tommarello and Francesco Zerilli, and their families, as above set forth, were each caused to suffer severe emotional distress. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs, and each of them, on behalf of the estate and heirs of John Buonocore III, Don Maland, Charles Shinn, Jeanne Shinn, Michael Sweis and Elena Tommarello, and on behalf of Salvatore Ferrigno, Nancy Gage, Mark Maland, Jeanette Sweis and Francesco Zerilli, demand that judgment be entered, jointly and severally, against Defendants for the damages they suffered, including, but not limited to, pain, suffering, mental anguish, and pecuniary losses, in the amount of ONE HUNDRED MILLION ($100,000,000.00) US Dollars for each of them, on this Count III, and their costs expended; as to each of their, mothers, father, sisters, brothers, daughters, spouses and sons above named, above in the amount of TEN MILLION DOLLARS ($10,000,000.00) for each and every one of them, on this Count III, and their costs expended, including attorney’s fees. 31 COUNT IV – ACTION FOR WRONGFUL DEATH (Under State Common Law and State Statutory Law) (Cecil Buonocore as the Personal Representative of the Estate of John Buonocore III, Nancy Gage, Mark Maland on behalf of the Estate of Don Maland, Beverley Mignery, as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Charles Shinn, and Bruno Pepenella on behalf of the Estate of Elena Tommarello) 105. Plaintiff Cecil Buonocore, as the Personal Representative of the Estate of John Buonocore III, repeats, realleges and incorporates by reference those facts and allegations set forth in each of the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 106. John Buonocore III’s death was caused by a willful and deliberate act of extrajudicial killing as he was murdered by members of the ANO during the course of their terrorist act of murder against him, as an American citizen, acting under the sponsorship of defendants Libya and Syria as well as the Syrian Air Force Intelligence, the Libyan External Security Agency, Libyan Internal Security Agency, General Muhammad al-Khuli, Mu’ammar al-Qadhdhafi, Major Abdallah al-Sanusi, and Ibrahaim al-Bishari. 107. Plaintiff Nancy Gage, in her individual capacity and in her capacity as the person to whom the amount recovered for the wrongful death of Frederick Gage belongs, repeats, realleges and incorporates by reference those facts and allegations set forth in each of the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 108. Frederick Gage’s death was caused by a willful and deliberate act of extrajudicial killing as he was murdered by members of the ANO during the course of their terrorist act of murder against him, as an American citizen, acting under the sponsorship of defendants Libya and Syria as well as the Syrian Air Force Intelligence, the Libyan External Security Agency, Libyan Internal Security Agency, General 32 Muhammad al-Khuli, Mu’ammar al-Qadhdhafi, Major Abdallah al-Sanusi, and Ibrahaim al-Bishari. 109. Plaintiff Mark Maland, on behalf of the Estate of Don Maland, repeats, realleges and incorporates by reference those facts and allegations set forth in each of the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 110. Don Maland’s death was caused by a willful and deliberate act of extrajudicial killing as he was murdered by members of the ANO during the course of their terrorist act of murder against him, as an American citizens, acting under the sponsorship of defendants Libya and Syria as well as the Syrian Air Force Intelligence, the Libyan External Security Agency, Libyan Internal Security Agency, General Muhammad al-Khuli, Mu’ammar al-Qadhdhafi, Major Abdallah al-Sanusi, and Ibrahaim al-Bishari. 111. Plaintiff Beverly Mignery, as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Charles Shinn, repeats, realleges and incorporates by reference those facts and allegations set forth in each of the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 112. Charles Shinn’s death was caused by a willful and deliberate act of extrajudicial killing, as his death resulted directly from injuries inflicted upon him by members of the ANO during the course of their terrorist act of murder against him, as an American citizen, acting under the sponsorship of defendants Libya and Syria as well as the Syrian Air Force Intelligence, the Libyan External Security Agency, Libyan Internal Security Agency, General Muhammad al-Khuli, Mu’ammar al-Qadhdhafi, Major Abdallah al-Sanusi, and Ibrahaim al-Bishari. 33 113. Plaintiff Bruno Pepenella, on behalf of the Estate of Elena Tommarello, repeats, realleges and incorporates by reference those facts and allegations set forth in each of the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 114. Elena Tommarello’s death was caused by a willful and deliberate act of extrajudicial killing as she was murdered by members of the ANO during the course of their terrorist act of murder against her, as an American citizen, acting under the sponsorship of defendants Libya and Syria as well as the Syrian Air Force Intelligence, the Libyan External Security Agency, Libyan Internal Security Agency, General Muhammad al-Khuli, Mu’ammar al-Qadhdhafi, Major Abdallah al-Sanusi, and Ibrahaim al-Bishari. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs Cecil Buonocore, as the Personal Representative of the Estate of John Buonocore III, Nancy Gage, Mark Maland, on behalf of the Estate of Don Maland, Beverly Mignery, as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Charles Shinn, and Bruno Pepenella, on behalf of the Estate of Elena Tommarello, demand that judgment be entered, jointly and severally, against Defendants for the damages they suffered, including, but not limited to, pecuniary losses, which include, but are not limited to, the loss of future earnings, and funeral and burial expenses, in the amount of ONE HUNDRED MILLION ($100,000,000.00) US Dollars on this Count IV, and their costs expended, including attorney’s fees. 34 COUNT V – ACTION FOR SURVIVAL DAMAGES (Under State Common Law and State Statutory Law) (Cecil Buonocore as the Personal Representative of the Estate of John Buonocore III, Nancy Gage, Mark Maland on behalf of the Estate of Don Maland, Beverley Mignery, as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Charles Shinn, and Bruno Pepenella, on behalf of the Estate of Elena Tommarello) 115. Plaintiff Cecil Buonocore, as the Personal Representative of the Estate of John Buonocore III, repeats, realleges and incorporates by reference those facts and allegations set forth in each of the foregoing paragraphs if fully set forth. 116. Before his death, John Buonocore III suffered extreme bodily pain and mental anguish and suffering, entitling his estate to compensatory damages. 117. Plaintiff Nancy Gage repeats, realleges and incorporates by reference those facts and allegations set forth in each of the foregoing paragraphs if fully set forth. 118. Before his death, Frederick Gage suffered extreme bodily pain and mental anguish and suffering, entitling Nancy Gage to compensatory damages as Frederick Gage’s sister and the person to whom recovery for his death belongs. 119. Plaintiff Mark Maland, on behalf of the Estate of Don Maland, repeats, realleges and incorporates by reference those facts and allegations set forth in each of the foregoing paragraphs if fully set forth. 120. Before his death, Don Maland suffered extreme bodily pain and mental anguish and suffering, entitling his estate to compensatory damages. 121. Plaintiff Beverly Shinn, as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Charles Shinn, repeats, realleges and incorporates by reference those facts and allegations set forth in each of the foregoing paragraphs if fully set forth. 35 122. Before his death, Charles Shinn suffered extreme bodily pain and mental anguish and suffering, entitling his estate to compensatory damages. 123. Plaintiff Bruno Pepenella, on behalf of the Estate of Elena Tommarello, repeats, realleges and incorporates by reference those facts and allegations set forth in each of the foregoing paragraphs if fully set forth. 124. Before her death, Elena Tommarello suffered extreme bodily pain and mental anguish and suffering, entitling his estate to compensatory damages. 125. Defendants Libya and Syria as well as the Syrian Air Force Intelligence, the Libyan External Security Agency, Libyan Internal Security Agency, General Muhammad al-Khuli, Mu’ammar al-Qadhdhafi, Major Abdallah al-Sanusi, and Ibrahaim al-Bishari are directly and/or vicariously responsible for the actions of their co-defendants because they acted as sponsors of the Abu Nidal Organization. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs Cecil Buonocore, as the Personal Representative of the Estate of John Buonocore III, Nancy Gage, Mark Maland, on behalf of the Estate of Don Maland, Beverly Mignery, as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Charles Shinn, and Bruno Pepenella, on behalf of the Estate of Elena Tommarello, demand that judgment be entered, jointly and severally, against Defendants for the damages they suffered, including, but not limited to, pain, suffering, mental anguish, and pecuniary losses, in the amount of ONE HUNDRED MILLION ($100,000,000.00) US Dollars on this Count V, and their costs expended, including attorney’s fees. 36 COUNT VI – ACTION FOR CIVIL CONSPIRACY (Under State Common Law) (As to All Plaintiffs) 126. Plaintiffs repeat, reallege and incorporate by reference those facts and allegations set forth in each of the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth. 127. Defendants Libya and Syria, as well as the Syrian Air Force Intelligence, the Libyan External Security Agency, Libyan Internal Security Agency, General Muhammad al-Khuli, Mu’ammar al-Qadhdhafi, Major Abdallah al-Sanusi, and Ibrahaim al-Bishari did knowingly and willfully conspire with and/or agree to sponsor a terrorist organization within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1605 (a)(7), which terrorist organization willfully and deliberately committed an act of terrorism, which caused the injuries, and/or death of John Buonocore III, Salvatore Ferrigno, Frederick Gage, Don Maland, Mark Maland, Charles Shinn, Jeanne Shinn, Jeanette Sweis, Michael Sweis, Elena Tommarello and Francesco Zerilli. 128. For the reasons stated above, and having conspired to sponsor the terrorist organization which willfully and deliberately committed an act of terrorism which caused the injuries and/or death of John Buonocore III, Salvatore Ferrigno, Frederick Gage, Don Maland, Mark Maland, Charles Shinn, Jeanne Shinn, Jeanette Sweis, Michael Sweis, Elena Tommarello and Francesco Zerilli, all defendants are jointly and severally liable to plaintiffs for all damages in this civil action. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs, and each of them, on behalf of the estate and heirs of John Buonocore III, Don Maland, Charles Shinn, Jeanne Shinn, Michael Sweis and Elena Tommarello, and on behalf of Salvatore Ferrigno, Nancy Gage, Mark Maland, Jeanette 37 Sweis and Francesco Zerilli, demand that judgment be entered, jointly and severally, against Defendants in the amount of ONE HUNDRED FIFTY MILLION ($150,000,000.00) DOLLARS for each of them, on this Count VI, and their costs expended, including attorney’s fees. COUNT VII – ACTION FOR AIDING AND ABETTING (Under State Common Law and State Statutory Law) (As to All Plaintiffs) 129. Plaintiffs repeat, reallege and incorporate by reference those facts and allegations set forth in each of the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth. 130. Defendants Libya and Syria as well as the Syrian Air Force Intelligence, the Libyan External Security Agency, Libyan Internal Security Agency, General Muhammad al-Khuli, Mu’ammar al-Qadhdhafi, Major Abdallah al-Sanusi, and Ibrahaim al-Bishari did knowingly and willfully provide substantial assistance and sponsor a terrorist organization within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1605 (a)(7), which terrorist organization willfully and deliberately committed an act of terrorism, which caused the injuries, and/or death of John Buonocore III, Salvatore Ferrigno, Frederick Gage, Don Maland, Mark Maland, Charles Shinn, Jeanne Shinn, Jeanette Sweis, Michael Sweis, Elena Tommarello and Francesco Zerilli. 131. For the reasons stated above, and having aided and abetted a terrorist organization which willfully and deliberately committed an act of terrorism which caused the injuries and/or death of John Buonocore III, Salvatore Ferrigno, Frederick Gage, Don Maland, Mark Maland, Charles Shinn, Jeanne Shinn, Jeanette Sweis, Michael Sweis, 38 Elena Tommarello and Francesco Zerilli, all defendants are jointly and severally liable to plaintiffs for all damages in this civil action. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs, and each of them, on behalf of the estate and heirs of John Buonocore III, Don Maland, Charles Shinn, Jeanne Shinn, Michael Sweis and Elena Tommarello, and on behalf of Salvatore Ferrigno, Nancy Gage, Mark Maland, Jeanette Sweis and Francesco Zerilli demand that judgment be entered, jointly and severally, against Defendants in the amount of ONE HUNDRED FIFTY MILLION ($150,000,000.00) DOLLARS for each of them, on this Count VII, and their costs expended, including attorney’s fees. COUNT VIII – PUNITIVE DAMAGES (Under the Flatow Amendment and State Common Law) (As to All Plaintiffs) 132. Plaintiffs repeat, reallege and incorporate by reference those facts and allegations set forth in each of the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth. 133. The actions of the ANO, as above set forth, were intentional and malicious and in willful, wanton and reckless disregard of the rights and well being of John Buonocore III, Salvatore Ferrigno, Frederick Gage, Don Maland, Mark Maland, Charles Shinn, Jeanne Shinn, Jeanette Sweis, Michael Sweis, Elena Tommarello and Francesco Zerilli. All of the acts of the ANO were facilitated by funding, training, support and sponsorship by Libya and Syria, as well as the Syrian Air Force Intelligence, the Libyan External Security Agency, Libyan Internal Security Agency, General Muhammad alKhuli, Mu’ammar al-Qadhdhafi, Major Abdallah al-Sanusi, and Ibrahaim al-Bishari.. 39 134. In providing such sponsorship General Muhammad al-Khuli, Mu’ammar alQadhdhafi, Major Abdallah al-Sanusi, Ibrahaim al-Bishari rendered material support to those actually carrying out the acts above described. The Plaintiffs are entitled to an award of punitive damages and same is hereby requested against the defendants, jointly and severally, in accordance with the provisions of Flatow Amendment making an official, employee, or agent of a nation which has been designated as a “state sponsor of terrorism under § 6(j) of the Export Administration Act of 1979”, liable for punitive damages under the factual circumstances as occurred during the course of committing these heinous and horrible acts of terrorism. 135. As required by the Flatow Amendment, General Muhammad al-Khuli, Mu’ammar al-Qadhdhafi, Major Abdallah al-Sanusi, Ibrahaim al-Bishari were acting within the scope of their duties when they supplied, facilitated or authorized the provision of material support to the ANO and the execution of the Rome Airport Attack. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs, and each of them, on behalf of estate and heirs of John Buonocore III, Don Maland, Charles Shinn, Jeanne Shinn, Michael Sweis and Elena Tommarello, and on behalf of Salvatore Ferrigno, Nancy Gage, Mark Maland, Jeanette Sweis and Francesco Zerilli, demand that judgment be entered, jointly and severally, against Defendants in the amount of ONE BILLION US DOLLARS ($1,000,000,000.00) for each of them, on this Count VIII, and their costs expended, including attorney’s fees. The award of punitive damages, as requested, is to punish General Muhammad alKhuli, Mu’ammar al-Qadhdhafi, Major Abdallah al-Sanusi, Ibrahaim al-Bishari for their conduct in supporting terrorism and the terrorist murderous acts described herein, and to 40 Of Counsel for Plaintiffs: F. R. Jenkins (Virginia Bar No. 36302) MERIDIAN 361 INTERNATIONAL LAW GROUP, PLLC 3 Field Court Ground Floor West Gray’s Inn London WC1R 5EF United Kingdom Telephone: 001 44 20 7841 5740 Telefax: 001 44 20 7841 5741 G:\Clients\Rome Bombing\Pleadings\Complaint v13.RDH redlined.042106.doc 42

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?