DOW JONES REUTERS BUSINESS INTERACTIVE, LLC v. ABLAISE LTD. et al
Filing
9
Attachment 2
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Matthew G. McAndrews. :Address- Niro Scavone Haller & Niro, 181 W. Madison St., Suite 4600, Chicago, IL 60602. Phone No. - 312-236-0733. by ABLAISE LTD., GENERAL INVENTORS INSTITUTE A, INC., ABLAISE LTD., GENERAL INVENTORS INSTITUTE A, INC.. (Attachments: #
1 Declaration#
2 Text of Proposed Order)(Owen, Amy)
DOW JONES REUTERS BUSINESS INTERACTIVE, LLC v. ABLAISE LTD. et al
Doc. 9 Att. 2
Case 1:06-cv-01015-JR
Document 9-3
Filed 09/19/2006
Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DOW JONES REUTERS BUSINESS INTERACTIVE, LLC d/b/a FACTIVA Plaintiff, v. ABLAISE LTD. and GENERAL INVENTIONS INSTITUTE A, INC. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Civil Action No. 1:06cv01015 Judge: James Robertson JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
ORDER AUTHORIZING PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION Upon the Motion of Amy S. Owen, a member in good standing of the Bar of the District of Columbia admitted to practice before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, seeking the entry of an Order permitting Matthew G. McAndrews of Niro, Scavone, Haller & Niro, to practice pro hac vice before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and to represent Defendants Ablaise, Ltd. And General Inventions Institute A, Inc. in this proceeding, and upon the declaration of Thomas G. Scavone, and for good cause appearing therefore; IT IS on this _________ day of September, 2006; ORDERED, that Matthew G. McAndrews, of the firm of Niro, Scavone, Haller & Niro, which maintains offices at 181 W. Madison St., Ste. 4600, Chicago, IL 60602, be and hereby is granted admission to appear pro hac vice in this proceeding.
__________________________________ United States District Court Judge
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?