CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON v. NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION
Filing
54
<![CDATA[
CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON v. NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION Doc. 54
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOHN GARD, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER Upon consideration of Defendant's Objection to the Magistrate Judge's October 15, 2008 Minute Order Denying Defendant's Motion for a Deposition De Bene Esse and Supporting Memorandum of Points and Authorities, any opposition thereto, and the entire record of this case, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Objection is sustained, and that Defendant shall be permitted to conduct a Deposition De Bene Ess of the witness Janice Steinbrueck by video teleconferencing equipment upon reasonable notice to Plaintiff at a time and location mutually convenient to the parties. Date this day of , 2008.
Civil Action No. 00-1096 (PLF)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dockets.Justia.com
cc: Oliver W. McDaniel Assistant United States Attorney Civil Division 555 Fourth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 James Fuchs, Esq. Law Offices of Snider & Associates, LLC 104 Church Lane Suite 100 Baltimore, Maryland 21208
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
