UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. THOMSON CORPORATION et al

Filing 22

NOTICE of Appearance by Travis Richard Chapman on behalf of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (Chapman, Travis)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. THOMSON CORPORATION et al Doc. 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. THE THOMSON CORPORATION, and REUTERS GROUP PLC, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: 1:08-cv-00262 Assigned To: Hogan, Thomas F. Assign. Date: 02/19/2008 Description: Antitrust NOTICE OF APPEARANCE To the Clerk of this court and all parties of record: Please enter the appearance of Travis Richard Chapman as counsel for Plaintiff United States of America in the above-captioned case. Dated: August 5, 2008 Respectfully submitted, FOR PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA /s/ Travis R. Chapman Travis R. Chapman Networks and Technology Enforcement Section United States Department of Justice Antitrust Division 600 E Street, N.W., Suite 9500 Washington, D.C. 20530 (202) 353-9006 Dockets.Justia.com CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Travis R. Chapman, hereby certify that on August 5, 2008, a true and accurate copy of this Notice of Appearance was filed electronically in the case identified above. A copy of the filing will be sent to the parties listed below via United States Postal Service mailing: Beau W. Buffier, Esq. Shearman & Sterling LLP 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022 (212) 848-4843 bbuffier@shearman.com Lee K. Van Voorhis, Esq. Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 1300 I Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20005 (202) 682-7272 lee.vanvoorhis@weil.com Counsel for Defendant Dated: August 5, 2008 FOR PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA /s/ Travis R. Chapman Travis R. Chapman Networks and Technology Enforcement Section United States Department of Justice Antitrust Division 600 E Street, N.W., Suite 9500 Washington, D.C. 20530 (202) 353-9006 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?