BRUNOTTE v. DOAN
Filing
93
STIPULATION and ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice and in accordance with settlement agreement.. Signed by Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr on 3/7/2013. (Scullin, Frederick)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
REBECCA A. BRUNOTTE
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
) Civil Action No. 08-0587 (FJS)
V.
)
) ECF
DAN M. TANGHERLINI
)
Acting Administrator, General Services
)
Administration
)
Defendant.
)
____________ )
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
It is hereby stipulated and agreed, by and between Plaintiff Rebecca Brunotte and
Defendant Dan M. Tangherlini, Acting Administrator, General Services Administration,
through their respective counsel, that this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice
pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and in
accordance with a settlement agreement fully executed by the parties.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/
______________________
JOSEPH V. KAPLAN
D.C. BAR # 347344
ANDREW J. PERLMUTTER
D.C. BAR # 489601
RONALD C. MACHEN, JR.,
D.C. BAR # 447889
United States Attorney
for the District of Columbia
1
PASSMAN & KAPLAN, P.C.
1828 L Street NW, Suite 600
Washington, D.C. 20036
(202) 789-0100
aperlmutter@passmanandkaplan.com
Attorneys for the Plaintiff
DANIEL F. VAN HORN,
D.C. BAR # 924092
Chief, Civil Division
By:
So Ordered:
___________________________
Frederick J. Scullin, Jr.
Senior U.S. District Judge
IT IS SO ORDERED:
/s/
HEATHER GRAHAM-OLIVER
___________________________
Assistant United States Attorney
Frederick J. Scullin, Jr.
Civil Division
Senior U.S. District Judge
555 Fourth St., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20530
Dated: ____________________
(202) 305-1334
Syracuse, NY
heather.graham-oliver@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for Defendant.
March 7, 2013
DENIED:
___________________________
Frederick J. Scullin, Jr.
Senior U.S. District Judge
Dated: ____________________
Syracuse, NY
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?