UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 8 GILCREASE LANE, QUINCY, FLORIDA 32351 et al

Filing 168

NOTICE OF PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES GOVERNMENTS POSITION ON MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM THE JUDGMENT, etc. by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA re 167 Unopposed MOTION Reissue Orders 156 and 163 and vacate 166 re 166 Order on Motion for Default Judgment, 156 Order on Motion to Withdraw,, Order on Motion for Hearing,,, 163 Order to Show Cause,Unopposed MOTION for Order Reissuing Orders 156, and 163 and vacating 166Unopposed MOTION Reissue Orders 156 and 163 and vacate 166 re 166 Order on Motion for Default Judgment, 156 Order on Motion to Withdraw,, Order on Motion for Hearing,,, 163 Order to Show Cause, (Wiegand, Barry)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 8 GILCREASE LANE, QUINCY, FLORIDA 32351 et al Doc. 168 Case 1:08-cv-01345-RMC Document 168 Filed 01/21/10 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. 8 GILCREASE LANE, QUINCY FLORIDA 32351, etc., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 08-1345 (RMC) ECF NOTICE OF PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT'S POSITION ON MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM THE JUDGMENT, etc. COMES NOW, plaintiff, the United States of America, by and through the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia, to give notice of its position on the recently filed Motion For Relief From The Judgment Pursuant To Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 60. This motion states that it is unopposed. Plaintiff wishes to make its position clear. In further support and explanation whereof, plaintiff respectfully states as follows: 1. First, plaintiff asserts that the Court ruled correctly when it issued orders in this matter on November 10, 2009, and November 16, 2009. The Court also properly granted on January 4, 2010, plaintiff's motion for a default judgment and final order of forfeiture. Second, the United States will contest in every Court at any level any challenge to any of these rulings as error. 2. Before filing the motion for relief from the judgment, etc., Mr. Charles A. Murray, Esq., spoke with undersigned counsel about plaintiff's position on the motion. The government does not oppose relief in the nature of an enlargement of time to bring to the Court's attention whatever arguments Mr. Bowdoin's counsel's client thinks appropriate. 3. Third, plaintiff asserts that the Court's rulings and issuance of a default judgment and Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:08-cv-01345-RMC Document 168 Filed 01/21/10 Page 2 of 3 final order of forfeiture were correct in law and fully justified by case's posture when the Court ruled. Fourth, plaintiff intends to file a memorandum of law with the Court supporting this position, within the time permitted under the rules. W H E R E F O R E , plaintiff respectfully prays this Honorable Court to accept this notice of its position on the pending motion. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Channing Phillips CHANNING PHILLIPS, D.C. Bar No. 415793 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY /s/ Deborah L. Connor DEBORAH L. CONNOR, D.C. Bar No. 452414 Assistant United States Attorney /s/ Barry Wiegand BARRY WIEGAND, D.C. Bar No. 424288 Assistant United States Attorney Criminal Division, Asset Forfeiture Unit 555 Fourth Street, N.W., Fourth Floor Washington, D.C. 20530 (202) 307-0299 William.B.Wiegand@USDoJ.Gov Counsel for Plaintiff United States Case 1:08-cv-01345-RMC Document 168 Filed 01/21/10 Page 3 of 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that I have caused the foregoing NOTICE OF PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT'S POSITION ON MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM THE JUDGMENT, etc., to be filed through the Court's ECF system on or before the 21st day of January 2010. As of this date, the only other parties to this action are the defendant properties, which are inanimate objects not represented by counsel. Further, I have transmitted this pleading by e-mail to Mr. Charles A. Murray, Esq. /s/ Barry Wiegand Barry Wiegand

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?