NOBLES v. WINTER
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Judge James Robertson on 6/29/09. (ms, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
ARCHIMEDES NOBLES, Plaintiff, v. DONALD C. WINTER, Secretary of the Navy, Defendant.
Civil Action No. 08-1396 (JR)
MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on defendant's motion to dismiss. Plaintiff is a former employee of the United States Navy in the Philippines whose formal employment discrimination claim was dismissed as untimely. See March 14, 2008 Decision of the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission, Appeal No. 0120081141 [Dkt. #4] at 1-2. It appears that neither the Navy nor the EEOC
addressed the merits of plaintiff's claim that the Navy "subjected [him] to discrimination on the basis of national origin (Filipino by blood relationship and U.S. citizenship by place of birth) when he was not granted coverage under the civil service retirement system when he started working . . . in the Philippines." Id. at 1.
In this action, plaintiff alleges that he is a dual citizen
of the Philippines and of the United States because he was born in 1938 in the Philippine Islands when the Philippine Islands were a United States territory. Compl. at 6. He asks the Court
to "confirm [his] having been born a US citizen" such that the United States Navy "allow[s] [him] to have access under [Title VII]." Id. at 7.
In Licudine v. Winter, 603 F. Supp. 2d 129 (D.D.C. 2009), this Court held that a person who, like plaintiff, was born in the Philippine Islands when the Philippines was a United States territory is neither a citizen nor a national of United States citizen. Id. at 135-36. Such a person, then, is an alien to Id. An
whom Title VII does not apply.
The Court will grant defendant's motion to dismiss. Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
JAMES ROBERTSON United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?