COCHRAN v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR U.S. ATTORNEYS et al
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 7/28/09. (lcrmc2)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
LARRY COCHRAN, Plaintiff, v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS, et al., Defendants.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Civil Action No. 08-1446 (RMC)
MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff brought this action under the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"), see 5 U.S.C. § 552, claiming that neither the United States Department of the Treasury nor the Executive Office for United States Attorneys, a component of the United States Department of Justice, released the records he requested. On March 6, 2009, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that each government entity reasonably construed Plaintiff's request, that staff conducted adequate searches reasonably calculated to locate responsive records, and that each entity otherwise complied in full with its obligations under the FOIA. On March 9, 2009, the Court issued an Order advising Plaintiff of his obligation to file an opposition or other response to the motion. The Order notified Plaintiff that, if he failed to respond by April 24, 2009, the Court would treat the motion as conceded. On Plaintiff's motion, the Court extended his filing deadline to May 26, 2009. On June 1, 2009, the Clerk of Court received plaintiff's response, which he mailed from prison on May 25, 2009.
"The Plaintiff agrees with the issuance of Summary Judgment in this case, and requests that the Court grant this Summary Judgment." Reply to Def.'s Mot. for Summ. J. at 1. Accordingly, the Court will grant Defendants' motion as conceded, and will deny Plaintiff's motion to compel production of documents as moot. An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
Date: July 28, 2009
/s/ ROSEMARY M. COLLYER United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?