MOHAMED et al v. GATES

Filing 105

ORDER granting Respondent's sealed consent motion 104 to deem as protected certain information in the proposed public factual return. See Order for additional deadlines and information. Signed by Judge Richard W. Roberts on 09/20/2011. (DCL)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _____________________________ ) ISMAIL MOHAMED et al., ) ) Petitioners, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 08-1789 (RWR) ) ROBERT GATES, ) ) Respondent. ) ) ORDER On January 25, 2011, the respondent filed a consent motion to deem protected information highlighted in the proposed public factual return for petitioner Ismael Arale, also known as Ismail Mohamed. On May 12, 2011, Judge Hogan issued an order granting the government’s motion to designate as protected under the Protective Order governing the Guantánamo Bay detainee litigation “sensitive but unclassified information falling within one of the following six categories”: 1. Names and/or other information that would tend to identify certain U.S. government employees, FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force members, or contractors — specifically, law enforcement officers, agents, translators, intelligence analysts, or interrogators, all below the Senior Exectuive Service or General Officer level — [or] the family members of detainees. 2. Information that would reveal the existence, focus, or scope of law enforcement or intelligence operations, including the sources, witnesses, or methods used and the identity of persons of interest. 3. Information indicating the names or locations, including geo-coordinates, of locations of interest as they pertain to counter-terrorism intelligence gathering, law enforcement, or military operations, -2where the Government has not previously acknowledged [publicly] its knowledge of those names or locations. 4. Information that would reveal the Government’s knowledge of telephone numbers, websites, passwords, passcodes, and e-mail addresses used by known or suspected terrorists, or discussions of the manner in which known or suspected terrorists use these methods for communications with one another. 5. Information regarding the use, effectiveness, or details regarding the implementation of certain interrogation approaches and techniques approved by Executive Order 13491 and described in the Army Field Manual No. 2-22.3. 6. Certain administrative data, operational “nicknames,” code words, dates of acquisition, including dates of interrogations, and FBI case names and file numbers, contained in the intelligence documents included in the factual returns. In re Guantánamo Bay Detainee Litig., 08-MC-442 (TFH), 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58856, at *5-7 (D.D.C. May 12, 2011). Upon review of the material submitted by the respondent, and in light of the petitioner’s consent and lack of public objection, it is hereby ORDERED that the respondents’ motion [104] to deem as protected the material highlighted in the accompanying proposed public factual return be, and hereby is, GRANTED, and the information identified by the respondents with green highlighting in the version of the factual return submitted under seal is deemed protected under paragraphs 10 and 34 of the Protective Order governing the Guantánamo Bay detainee litigation. further It is -3ORDERED that the respondents file by October 4, 2011, a properly redacted public version of this factual return on the public docket. SIGNED this 20th day of September, 2011. /s/ RICHARD W. ROBERTS United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?