ABDALLAH AL ANSI et al v. BUSH et al

Filing 184

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 181 Respondents' Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery; Respondents shall have up to and including December 10, 2010, in which to certify compliance with their exculpatory production requ irements; Respondents shall submit additional inculpatory material they intend to use in their motion for judgment on the record and at the merits hearing by December 22, 2010, Responents shall file their Motion for Judgment on the Record on or before January 7, 2010; there will be a telephone status conference call on December 9, 2010, at 4:00 p.m. Signed by Judge Gladys Kessler on 12/7/10. (CL, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MUHAMMAD AHMAD ABDALLAH AL-ANSI, Petitioner, v. BARACK H. OBAMA, et al., Respondents. : : : : : : : : : : Civil Action No. 08-1923 (GK) ORDER Upon consideration of Respondents' Motion to Amend the Court's Scheduling Order, the Petitioner's Opposition, and the Respondents' Reply, it is this 7th day of December, 2010, hereby ORDERED, that the Respondents' Motion to Amend the Court's Scheduling Order is granted in part; and it is further ORDERED, that Respondents shall have up to and including December 10, 2010, to certify compliance with their exculpatory production requirements; and it is further ORDERED, that Respondents shall submit additional inculpatory material they intend to use in their motion for judgment on the record and at the merits hearing by December 22, 2010; and it is further ORDERED, that Respondents shall file their Motion for Judgment on the Record on or before January 7, 2010; and it is further ORDERED, that the parties shall have a telephonic status conference call on December 9, 2010 at 4:00 p.m. /s/ Gladys Kessler United States District Judge Copies via ECF to all counsel of record -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?