GRIMES v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al

Filing 81

MEMORANDUM ORDER, Ordered that plaintiff's opening brief is due May 29, 2012; and it is further Ordered that defendants' brief is due June 28, 2012; and it is further Ordered that plaintiff's reply brief is due July 13, 2012. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Richard J. Leon on 4/19/2012. (see memorandum order) (kc )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

PATRICIA GRIMES, as the next best
friend and Personal Representative of the
Estate of Karl Grimes,
Plaintiff,

)
)
)
)
)

)

v.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al.
Defendants.

Civil Case No. 08-2024 (RJL)

)
)
)
)
)

~

MEMORANDUM ORDER
(April
2012)

ft,

On March 2, 2012, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
remanded this action for the Court to "consider the effect of the 2010 amendments to
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 and 'state on the record the reasons for granting or
denying [the summary jUdgment] motion.'" Grimes v. Dist. of Columbia, No. 11-7053
(D.C. Cir. Mar. 2, 2012) (per curiam) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a)). Therefore, this
Court directs the parties to submit briefs addressing "the effect[ on this case, if any,] of
the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56," as well as, "the interaction
of amended Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(e) and the accompanying 2010 Advisory
Committee Note, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55, and Local Rule 7(b )." Id.

It is hereby

ORDERED that plaintiffs opening brief is due May 29,2012; and it is further
ORDERED that defendants' brief is due June 28, 2012; and it is further
ORDERED that plaintiffs reply brief is due July 13,2012.

SO ORDERED.

2