HOLLISTER v. SOETORO et al
Filing
12
ORDER that defendants need not respond to the amended complaint and that plaintiff's response to the motion to dismiss is due 2/13/09. Signed by Judge James Robertson on February 11, 2009. (MT)
<![CDATA[
HOLLISTER v. SOETORO et al
Doc. 12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GREGORY S. HOLLISTER, Plaintiff, v. BARRY SOETORO, et al., Defendants. : : : : : Civil Action No. 08-2254 (JR) : : : : ORDER Plaintiff's amended complaint [#11] adds nothing to the original complaint except rhetoric and legal theory and creates no obligation upon the defendants to respond to it. Nor is the
amended complaint responsive to defendants' motion to dismiss [#9], opposition to which was due on 2/9/09. Unless points and
authorities in opposition to the motion to dismiss are filed by 2/13/09, the motion will be treated as conceded and granted. is SO ORDERED. It
JAMES ROBERTSON United States District Judge
Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
