IN RE: GUANTANAMO BAY DETAINEE LITIGATION

Filing 1042

NOTICE of Errata by GUANTANAMO BAY DETAINEE LITIGATION re 881 Notice (Other) (Cox, James)

Download PDF
IN RE: GUANTANAMO BAY DETAINEE LITIGATION Doc. 1042 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ IN RE: ) ) GUANTANAMO BAY ) Misc. No. 08-442 (TFH) DETAINEE LITIGATION ) ) ____________________________________) ABU RAWDAH (AHMED ADNAN ) MOHAMMED AHJAM), ) Petitioner, ) ) Civil Action No. 05-CV-2385 (RMU) v. ) Civil Action No. 05-CV-2386 (RBW) ) GEORGE W. BUSH, ) President of the United States, et al., ) ) Respondents. ) ) NOTICE OF ERRATA Petitioner Abu Rawdah (Ahmed Adnan Mohammed Ahjam) (ISN 326) has filed (or has had filed on his behalf) petitions for writ of habeas corpus in both of the above-entitled cases. Petitioner was dismissed from Civil Action No. 05-CV-2385 (RMU), and Civil Action No. 05CV-2386 (RBW) is now his active petition. On October 30, 2008, Respondents filed an Amended Factual Return to Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus. Respondents inadvertently filed the Amended Factual Return in Civil Action No. 05-CV-2385 (RMU). Respondents hereby correct the record to clarify /// /// /// /// Dockets.Justia.com that the Amended Factual Return to Petitioner's petition should have been filed in Civil Action No. 05-CV-2386 (RBW). Dated: November 25, 2008 Respectfully submitted, GREGORY G. KATSAS Assistant Attorney General JOHN C. O'QUINN Deputy Assistant Attorney General /s/ James E. Cox, Jr. JOSEPH H. HUNT (D.C. Bar No. 431134) VINCENT M. GARVEY (D.C. Bar No. 127191) TERRY M. HENRY ANDREW I. WARDEN PAUL E. AHERN JAMES E. COX, JR. Attorneys United States Department of Justice Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch 20 Massachusetts Avenue N.W. Washington, DC 20530 Tel: (202) 305-8629 Fax: (202) 305-2685 Attorneys for Respondents

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?