IN RE: GUANTANAMO BAY DETAINEE LITIGATION

Filing 107

STATUS REPORT by ALLA ALI BIN ALI AHMED. (Rushforth, Brent)

Download PDF
IN RE: GUANTANAMO BAY DETAINEE LITIGATION Doc. 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE GUANTANAMO BAY DETAINEE LITIGATION _______________________________________ This document relates to: ALLA ALI BIN ALI AHMED, also listed as ALI BIN ALI ALEH, and Wagdi Ali Bin Ali as Next Friend of Alla Ali Bin Ali Ahmed, Petitioners/Plaintiffs, v. GEORGE W. BUSH, et al., Respondents/Defendants. PETITIONER ALI AHMED'S STATUS REPORT This status report describes the current position of Petitioner Ali Ahmed's habeas corpus petition, filed on August 20, 2005. Factual Return. Respondent produced a factual return in this case on March 7, 2006. Protective Order. The following protective orders were entered in this case on December 7, 2005: (1) the Amended Protective Order and Procedures for Counsel Access to Detainees at the United States Naval Base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, first Misc. No. 08-442 (TFH) Civil Action No. 05-1678 (GK) Dockets.Justia.com issued on November 8, 2004, 344 F. Supp. 2d 174 (D.D.C. 2004); (2) the Order Addressing Designation Procedures for "Protected Information," first issued on November 10, 2004; and (3) the Order Supplementing and Amending Filing Procedures Contained in November 8, 2004 Amended Protective Order, first issued on December 13, 2004. Notice of Transfer. On December 7, 2005, the court entered an order requiring the government to provide the Court and Petitioners' counsel with thirty days advance notice of transfer from Guantanamo. Pending Motions. This case has 2 pending motions. On April 19, 2007, Respondents filed a Motion to Dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. This motion should be denied in light of the Supreme Court's ruling in Boumediene v. Bush, 128 S. Ct. 2229 (2008). On June 7, 2007, Petitioners filed a Motion to Stay Habeas Action and Hold Habeas Action in Abeyance Pending Exhaustion of Remedies and Supreme Court Consideration of Jurisdiction. This motion is properly dismissed as moot in light of the Supreme Court's ruling in Boumediene v. Bush, 128 S. Ct. 2229 (2008) and because Petitioner did not file a petition for release under the Detainee Treatment Act. Status of Stay. The court stayed this case on December 7, 2005, pending the resolution of Khalid v. Bush, No. 04-1142, and In re Guantanamo Detainee Cases, No. 02-299. The stay should be removed immediately, allowing Petitioner to pursue his case in an expeditious manner, as the Supreme Court instructed in Boumediene v. Bush, 128 S. Ct. 2229 (2008). 2 Dated: July 18, 2008 R e s p e c t f u l l y submitted, Counsel for Petitioner: /s/ Brent N. Rushforth Brent N. Rushforth (DC 331074) Kit A. Pierson (DC 398123) Sarah B. Pojanowski (DC 502036) HELLER EHRMAN LLP 1717 Rhode Island Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036 Tel: (202) 912-2000 Fax: (202) 912-2020 Shayana Kadidal (DC 49512) Pardiss Kebriaei (DC 51395) CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS 666 Broadway, 7th Floor New York, New York 10012 Tel: (212) 614-6439 Fax: (212) 614-6499 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ALLA ALI BIN ALI AHMED, also listed as ALI BIN ALI ALEH; and Wagdi Ali Bin Ali as Next Friend of Alla Ali Bin Ali Ahmed; Petitioners/Plaintiffs, v. GEORGE W. BUSH, et al., Respondents/Defendants. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that, on this 18th day of July, 2008, I caused a true and correct copy of PETITIONER ALI AHMED'S STATUS REPORT to be served by on the ECF system: TERRY M. HENRY ANDREW WARDEN JUDRY SUBAR United States Department of Justice Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch 20 Massachusetts Ave., N.W. Washington, DC 20530 Tel: (202) 514-4107 Fax: (202) 616-8470 Counsel for Respondents /s/ Brent N. Rushforth MISC. ACTION NO. 08:442 (TFH) CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-CV-01678 (GK) 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?