IN RE: GUANTANAMO BAY DETAINEE LITIGATION

Filing 1419

REPLY re (173 in 1:05-cv-00023-RWR, 1381 in 1:08-mc-00442-TFH) MOTION to Compel filed by HANI SALEH RASHID ABDULLAH. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Carpenter, Charles)

Download PDF
______________________________________________ From: Carpenter, Charles Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 5:34 PM To: 'david.avila2@usdoj.com' Subject: Discovery in 05-23 (ISN 841) Dear Mr. Avila: By our count, your responses to the discovery requests are due today, Friday December 19, 2008. We reach this conclusion by giving you full credit for the day you sought reconsideration, but not the days after that that Judge Roberts ordered the government to comply with discovery requests notwithstanding the motion. When Judge Hogan suspended your discovery obligation, he warned the government that it would need to continue to prepare its responses -- while this arguably should shorten your time further, we are willing to grant what amounts to a complete stop of the clock during that period We are also willing to extend the government's time to respond to our discovery request until December 22, 2008, provided the government agrees to comply to the full extent of the case management order, as amended. Obviously, your contention, then or now, that a request was overbroad does not relieve you of the obligation to respond to requests or portions of requests that are not overbroad (and Judge Hogan has defined the limits in his amended order). If you do not intend to comply fully with the court orders currently in effect on this point, please let us know asap, so we can schedule an opportunity to meet and confer in advance of our motion to compel. Charles H. Carpenter Attorney at Law Pepper Hamilton LLP Hamilton Square 600 Fourteenth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005-2004 202.220.1507 - Direct 202.220.1665 - Fax 603.258.8131 - Direct Fax carpenterc@pepperlaw.com www.pepperlaw.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?