IN RE: GUANTANAMO BAY DETAINEE LITIGATION

Filing 1538

ORDER regarding transferred or released petitioners in 08-mc-0442. Signed by Judge Thomas F. Hogan on 1/22/09. (lctfh1)

Download PDF
IN RE: GUANTANAMO BAY DETAINEE LITIGATION Doc. 1538 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE: PETITIONERS SEEKING HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF IN RELATION TO PRIOR DETENTIONS AT GUANTANAMO BAY Misc. No. 08-0444 (TFH) Civil Action Nos. 04-cv-1194, 04-cv-1254, 05-cv-0023, 05-cv-0520, 05-cv-0764, 05-cv-0883, 05-cv-0998, 05-cv-1124, 05-cv-1505, 05-cv-1509, 05-cv-2104, 05-cv-2367, 05-cv-2384, 05-cv-2385, 05-cv-2386, 05-cv-2479, 08-cv-1104, 08-cv-1185, 08-cv-1223, 08-cv-1229, 08-cv-1231, 08-cv-1628 ORDER The Court ORDERS that the cases of petitioners in the above-captioned civil cases who were previously detained at the United States Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba are tr ansfer r ed from 08-mc-0442 to 08-mc-0444 for coordination and management purposes. The Mer it Judges will continue retain the case for all other purposes. All future filings shall be captioned to identify the Miscellaneous Number established solely for the purpose of consolidating the proceedings before the undersigned as well as under the Civil Action Number originally assigned to the petition. Accordingly, the parties shall adhere to the above case-caption format for the purpose of filing all documents in these cases, although the only Civil Action Numbers that will be identified on any given filing will be the number s applicable to that particular filing. For example, if the petitioner in Civil Action No. 09-0111 files a document that applies only to his case, the case caption should be formatted as follows, with the "XXX" representing the initials of the appropriate judge: Dockets.Justia.com IN RE: Misc. No. 08-0444 (TFH) PETITIONERS SEEKING HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF IN RELATION TO PRIOR DETENTIONS AT GUANTANAMO BAY Civil Action No. 09-0111 (XXX) If, however, a filing applies to all cases, then it shall be filed as indicated in the caption below, which lists all applicable Civil Action Numbers as well as the required Miscellaneous Number: IN RE: PETITIONERS SEEKING HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF IN RELATION TO PRIOR DETENTIONS AT GUANTANAMO BAY Misc. No. 08-0444 (TFH) Civil Action Nos. 02-cv-1130, 04-cv-1254, 05-cv-0584, 05-cv-0723, 05-cv-0891, 05-cv-1237, 05-cv-1493, 05-cv-1668, 05-cv-1894, 05-cv-2336, 05-cv-2386, 06-cv-1675, 06-cv-1687, 08-cv-1185, 04-cv-1135, 05-cv-0023, 05-cv-0586, 05-cv-0764, 05-cv-0998, 05-cv-1242, 05-cv-1505, 05-cv-1714, 05-cv-2029, 05-cv-2367, 05-cv-2452, 06-cv-1677, 06-cv-1763, 08-cv-1223, 04-cv-1144, 05-cv-0345, 05-cv-0640, 05-cv-0878, 05-cv-1001, 05-cv-1243, 05-cv-1509, 05-cv-1779, 05-cv-2104, 05-cv-2369, 05-cv-2458, 06-cv-1678, 06-cv-1768, 08-cv-1229, 04-cv-1194, 05-cv-0490, 05-cv-0665, 05-cv-0883, 05-cv-1009, 05-cv-1246, 05-cv-1635, 05-cv-1806, 05-cv-2197, 05-cv-2384, 05-cv-2466, 06-cv-1679, 06-cv-1769, 08-cv-1231, 04-cv-1227, 05-cv-0520, 05-cv-0714, 05-cv-0887, 05-cv-1124, 05-cv-1311, 05-cv-1667, 05-cv-1864, 05-cv-2216, 05-cv-2385, 05-cv-2479, 06-cv-1683, 08-cv-1104, 08-cv-1628 When filing a document by ECF, enter the Miscellaneous Number, a comma, and then the applicable Civil Action Number(s) to make sure the document appears in all the relevant case dockets. There should be no space after the comma and before the Civil Action Number(s) (i. e. , enter the case numbers as, for example, "08mc123,09cv111,09cv1112"). Notices of appearance need not be refiled under this Miscellaneous Case Number 2 (08-mc-0444) if such a notice already has been filed in the docket for the corresponding Civil Action Number. New notices of appearance likewise should be filed exclusively in the docket for the applicable Civil Action Number. Accordingly, no notices of appearance need be filed in the docket for this Miscellaneous Case Number. SO ORDERED. January 22, 2009 /s/ Thomas F. Hogan United States District Judge 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?