IN RE: GUANTANAMO BAY DETAINEE LITIGATION

Filing 900

ORDER denying (docket # 598, 05-cv-2386; docket # 537, 08-mc-442) Motion For Leave To Submit Supplemental Declaration For In Camera Review. Signed by Judge Thomas F. Hogan on 10/31/2008. (lctfh1)

Download PDF
IN RE: GUANTANAMO BAY DETAINEE LITIGATION Doc. 900 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE: Misc. No. 08-0442 (TFH) GUANTANAMO BAY DETAINEE LITIGATION Civil Action No. 05-2386 ORDER Pending before the Court is Petitioner's counsel's Motion For Leave To Submit Supplemental Declaration For In Camera Review (docket # 598, 05-cv-2386). Because the Supplemental Declaration of James A. Nickovich does not contain attorney-client privileged infor mation, 1 the Court ORDERS that the Motion is DENIED. The Court further ORDERS that, by November 28, 2008, counsel for Petitioner Samir LNU, also known as Mohammed Noor Uthman, (ISN 707) shall comply with the Court's Order of July 29, 2008, by filing a signed authorization from Petitioner to pursue this action or a declaration by counsel that states that Petitioner directly authorized counsel to pursue the action and explains why counsel was unable to secure a signed authorization. October 31, 2008 /s/ Thomas F. Hogan United States District Judge At most, the declaration reveals information surrounding counsel's attempted communication with Petitioner; there is nothing in the declaration that reveals confidential communications between counsel and Petitioner. Therefore, the attorney-client privilege is inapplicable. See In re Lindsey, 158 F.3d 1263, 1267 (D.C. Cir. 1998) (per curiam) ("The attorney-client privilege protects confidential communications made between clients and their attorneys when the communications are for the purpose of securing legal advice or services."). 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?