AL-ZAHRANI v. DONALD RUMSFELD, et al
Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages by ALI ABDULLAH AHMED AL-SALAMI, TALAL AL-ZAHRANI (Kebriaei, Pardiss)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
TALAL AL-ZAHRANI, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DONALD RUMSFELD, et al. and UNITED STATES, Defendants. UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF PAGE LIMIT Plaintiffs hereby move for an order for an enlargement of the page limit for their Reply in support of their Motion for Reconsideration in Light of Newly-Discovered Evidence to include three additional pages, for a Reply of 28 total pages. The additional pages are needed in order to respond to Defendants' two briefs in opposition, totaling 50 pages in combination. Defendants do not oppose this motion. Dated: May 3, 2010 Respectfully submitted, _/s/ Pardiss Kebriaei______________ Pardiss Kebriaei (pursuant to LCvR 83.2(g)) William Goodman (pursuant to LCvR 83.2(g)) Shayana Kadidal (D.C. Bar No. 454248) Joshua M. Rosenthal (pursuant to LCvR 83.2(g)) CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS 666 Broadway, 7th Floor New York, NY 10012 Tel: (212) 614-6452 Fax: (212) 614-6499 firstname.lastname@example.org Counsel for Plaintiffs Case No. 09-cv-00028 (ESH)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?