GASTON v. PINELLAS COUNTY STATE COURT

Filing 3

MEMORANDUM OPINION Signed by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle on 2/16/09. (ls, )

Download PDF
, J FILED MAR - 5 2009 NANCY MAYER WHITTINGTON ClERK U.S. DISTRICT COURT' UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Lorenzie F. Gaston, Plaintiff, v. Pinellas County State Court, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 09 0433 MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter comes before the court on the plaintiff s pro se complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the application to proceed in forma pauperis and will dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction. Plaintiff is an inmate in the Taylor Correctional Institution in Perry, Florida, serving a sentence imposed by the Pinellas County State Court. Notwithstanding that the pro se submission is titled a complaint, it appears to attack the validity of the state court conviction, alleging actual innocence, ineffective assistance of counsel, and wrongful incarceration. As such, it will be construed as a petition for habeas review under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Federal court review of state convictions is available under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 but only after the exhaustion of available state remedies. See 28 U.S.C. §2254(b)(1). Thereafter, "an application for a writ of habeas corpus [] made by a person in custody under the judgment and sentence of a State court ... may be filed in the district court for the district wherein such person is in custody or in the district court for the district within which the State court was held which convicted and sentenced [petitioner] and each of such district courts shall have concurrent jurisdiction to entertain the application." 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). To the extent that petitioner has exhausted his state remedies, his federal recourse lies in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. A separate final order accompanies this memorandum opinion. D!0.L- 0 jfwlL United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?