UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MORTEN

Filing 18

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 9 the plaintiff's motion to dismiss the defendant's counterclaims; dismissing the defendant's counterclaim alleging breach of contract; denying 13 the defendant's motion to enjoin the United States from proceeding with this collection action; denying 12 Unfoldment, Inc.'s motion to intervene as a third-party plaintiff; ordering the defendant to amend her pleadings in the manner specified on or before August 20, 2010. Signed by Judge Paul L. Friedman on August 4, 2010. (lcplf2)

Download PDF
-DAR UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MORTEN Doc. 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MARLENE MORTEN, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) Civil Action No. 09-1018 ORDER For the reasons given in the Opinion issued this same day, it is hereby ORDERED that [9] the motion of the United States to dismiss Ms. Morten's counterclaims against it is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; it is FURTHER ORDERED that Ms. Morten's counterclaim alleging that the United States is liable for the breach of contracts between the District of Columbia and Unfoldment, Inc. is DISMISSED; it is FURTHER ORDERED that [13] Ms. Morten's motion to enjoin the United States from proceeding with this collection action is DENIED; it is FURTHER ORDERED that [12] Unfoldment, Inc.'s motion to intervene as a third-party plaintiff is DENIED; and it is Dockets.Justia.com FURTHER ORDERED that on or before August 20, 2010, Ms. Morten will amend her pleadings to reflect her filing of an administrative claim for a refund of tax penalties from the IRS and her understanding of the status of that claim. SO ORDERED. /s/________________________________ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN United States District Judge DATE: August 4, 2010 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?