DIXON v. MIDLAND MORTGAGE CO.

Filing 15

MEMORANDUM ORDER striking the plaintiff's amended complaint 14 . Signed by Judge Richard W. Roberts on 8/27/10. (lcrwr2)

Download PDF
DIXON v. MIDLAND MORTGAGE CO. Doc. 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ______________________________ ) RON DIXON, as Conservator for ) Beatrice Jiggetts, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MIDLAND MORTGAGE CO., ) ) Defendant. ) ______________________________) Civil Action No. 09-1789 (RWR) MEMORANDUM ORDER The defendant removed this action from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia on September 21, 2009 and on September 28, 2009 moved under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) to dismiss the entire complaint, which raised claims of breach of contract, trespass and conversion. On June 29, 2010, the defendant's motion was granted as to the plaintiff's conversion claim, but denied as to the plaintiff's breach of contract and trespass claims. On August 2, 2010, without seeking leave to amend, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint purporting to add a wrongful eviction claim. Entry #14.) (Am. Compl. Docket Under Rule 15(a), a party may amend its pleading once as a matter of course within 21 days after it is served, 21 days after service of the responsive pleading if the pleading is one to which a responsive pleading is required, or 21 days after service of a motion under Rule 12(b), (e), or (f). Fed. R. Civ. Dockets.Justia.com -2P. 15(a)(1). "In all other cases, a party may amend its pleading only with the opposing party's written consent or the court's leave." Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). Because the plaintiff did not file timely his amended complaint or seek leave to amend or submit any written consent from the defendant, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff's amended complaint [14] be, and hereby is, STRICKEN. SIGNED this 27th day of August, 2010. /s/ RICHARD W. ROBERTS United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?