GOINS v. DAS et al

Filing 3

MEMORANDUM OPINION Signed by Judge Paul L. Friedman on 10/16/09. (ls, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Pamela Diane Goins, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FILED OCT 302009 Clerk, U.S. District and Bankruptcy Courts v. Shyan Das et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's pro se complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant plaintiff's application and dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The subject matter jurisdiction of the federal district courts is limited and is set forth generally at 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1332. Under those statutes, federal jurisdiction is available only when a "federal question" is presented or the parties are of diverse citizenship and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. A party seeking relief in the district court must at least plead facts that bring the suit within the court's jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). Failure to plead such facts warrants dismissal of the action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). Plaintiff is a resident of Capitol Heights, Maryland, suing four defendants, one of whom resides in Bowie, Maryland. Plaintiff alleges that she "was wrongfully accused of criminal misconduct on the job that was completely inaccurate," which served as "grounds for [her] termination." CompI. at 1. The complaint, presumably for wrongful discharge, neither presents a federal question nor provides a basis for diversity jurisdiction because plaintiff and at least one defendant reside in the same state and no amount in controversy is pleaded. Accordingly, the complaint will be dismissed. I A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. Date: October~, 2009 (iZ,Ze:LIl. United States District Judge I Presumably plaintiff may seek redress in the appropriate state or local court. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?