MCBRIEN v. UNITED STATES et al
MEMORANDUM OPINION dismissing the complaint as frivolous. Signed by Judge Richard W. Roberts on 01/25/2010. (DCL)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ______________________________ ) KAREN McBRIEN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 09-2432 (RWR) ) UNITED STATES et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Karen McBrien, proceeding pro se, has filed a complaint against the United States and numerous other defendants generally based on the same events complained of in McBrien v. FBI et al., Civil Action No. 09-197 (CKK), which was dismissed as frivolous because the events alleged in the complaint constituted "fantastic or delusional scenarios," see id., 2009 WL 260043, at *1 (D.D.C. February 3, 2009), and McBrien v. United States et al., Civil Action No. 09-1527 (RBW), which was dismissed for presenting "fantastic and delusional scenarios of a nationwide conspiracy involving [McBrien's] relatives, former relatives, and numerous state and federal agencies who work in concert to spy on, control, injure, and trick the plaintiff." 2525152, at *1 (D.D.C. August 13, 2009). Id., 2009 WL
Because a complaint may
be dismissed if it is frivolous or fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, see Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 31-33 (1992); Tooley v. Napolitano, 586 F.3d 1006, 1009 (D.C.
-2Cir. 2009); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1)(B), this complaint also warrants dismissal as frivolous. An appropriate order
accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. SIGNED this 25th day of January, 2010.
/s/ RICHARD W. ROBERTS United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?