LOPEZ et al v. COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS ACTION NETWORK, INC.
Filing
112
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that this case will proceed to trial; and the parties shall submit a joint schedule concerning expert discovery on or before October 14, 2016. Signed by Judge Paul L. Friedman on October 7, 2016. (MA)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
___________________________________
IFTIKHAR SAIYED,
Plaintiff,
v.
COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC
RELATIONS ACTION NETWORK, INC.,
Defendant.
___________________________________
RENE ARTURO LOPEZ, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC
RELATIONS ACTION NETWORK, INC.,
Defendant.
___________________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 10-0022 (PLF)
Civil Action No. 10-0023 (PLF)
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
These consolidated matters are before the Court following the June 21, 2016
decision of the D.C. Circuit — Lopez v. Council on Am.-Islamic Relations Action Network,
Inc., 826 F.3d 492 (D.C. Cir. 2016) — to reverse and remand the Court’s grant of summary
judgment to the defendants, Saiyed v. Council on Am.-Islamic Relations Action Network, Inc.,
78 F. Supp. 3d 465 (D.D.C. 2015).
At the Court’s request, the parties jointly filed a status report on September 29,
2016 [Dkt. 107 in 10-0022; Dkt. 111 in 10-0023], and the Court held a status conference on
October 5, 2016 to address the disagreements that the parties explained in their joint status report
concerning: (1) the parameters of the case on remand from the D.C. Circuit, and (2) the scope of
expert discovery. The Court previously bifurcated fact and expert discovery in these
consolidated matters. See Scheduling Order at 2-3 (Feb. 24, 2011) [Dkt. 29 in 10-0022; Dkt. 28
in 10-0023]. Based upon the Court’s review of its Opinion granting summary judgment to
defendants, the D.C Circuit Opinion, and the representations of the parties in the joint status
report and at the October 5, 2016 status conference, it is hereby
ORDERED that this case will proceed to trial on three remaining causes of action:
(1) common law fraud under Virginia law; (2) common law breach of fiduciary duty under
Virginia law; and (3) violation of the Virginia Consumer Protection Act, Va. Code Ann.
§ 59.1-196 et seq.; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that fact discovery is closed and the Court will not permit
its reopening except by a motion demonstrating good cause; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiffs are limited to the two experts identified
to the Court at the October 5, 2016 status conference; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall submit a joint schedule concerning
expert discovery on or before October 14, 2016.
SO ORDERED.
/s/________________________
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN
United States District Judge
DATE: October 7, 2016
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?