UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT SERVICES, INC.

Filing 125

ORDER granting the parties, per their request in 124 , until 10/09/12 to file a Status Report re the Court's Order in 116 & 117 . Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 10/01/2012. (lcrcl4)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT
SERVICES, INC.,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

10-cv-530 (RCL)

ORDER
On August 31, 2012, this Court resolved several discovery disputes. U.S. v. Kellogg,
Brown & Root Servs., Inc., __ F.R.D. __, 2012 WL 3776708 (D.D.C. 2012) (ECF Nos. 116,
117). That Opinion indicated that defendant Kellogg, Brown & Root (“KBR”) is entitled to
limited discovery on force protection matters relating to the parties’ LOGCAP III agreement.
U.S. v. KBR, 2012 WL 3776708 at *10–*12. The Court ordered the parties to meet and confer,
over the following thirty days, to discuss the scope and schedule for this additional production.
See id. at *18. The Court ordered the parties, after these thirty days, to apprise the Court of their
progress and ask for an extension if necessary. Id.
Those thirty days have passed, and the parties submitted a Joint Status Report in
Response to Court Order of August 31, 2012. Oct. 1, 2012, ECF No. 124. The Report states:
“The parties are continuing to meet and confer regarding these and other issues and respectfully
request the Court to permit the parties an additional week – i.e., until Tuesday, October 9, 2012 –
to conclude their discussions and apprise the Court of their proposals for future proceedings in
this action.” Id.

The Court will grant the parties’ request for additional time.

Therefore, the Court

ORDERS:
The parties shall on or before October 9, 2012 apprise the Court of their progress in
resolving the remaining discovery issues. A joint Status Update, filed electronically with the
Court, will suffice. If the parties come to a compromise, they shall inform the Court of the
agreement struck and propose a schedule for accomplishing the additional discovery. If the
parties cannot come to an agreement, they may ask the Court for additional time or ask the Court
enter an Order to Compel.
IT IS SO ORDERED
Signed by Royce C. Lamberth, Chief Judge, on October 1, 2012.

2