TULL v. OFFICE OF THE ARCHITECT OF THE CAPITOL et al

Filing 18

ORDER, For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is this 23rd day of August, 2011, hereby ORDERED that the defendants' Motion to Dismiss 8 is GRANTED; it is further ORDERED that the above-captioned case is DISMISSED with prejudice. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Richard J. Leon on 8/23/2011. (kc )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
JOSEPH TULL,

)
)

Plaintiff,

)
)

v.

)
)

OFFICE OF THE ARCHITECT OF
THE CAPITOL,

)
)
)

STEPHEN AYERS, the Architect of the
Capitol, in his personal capacity,

)
)
)

REBECCA TISCIONE, a retired
employee of the Architect of the
Capitol, in her personal capacity,

)
)
)
)

EVELYN GOODWIN, an employee of
the Architect of the Capitol, in her
personal capacity,

)
)
)
)

TONDA CAVE, an employee of the
Architect of the Capitol, in her personal
capacity,

)
)
)
)

EDGARD MARTINEZ, an employee of )
the Architect of the Capitol, in his
)
personal capacity,
)
)

and

)
)

WILLIAM MILLER, an employee of
the Architect of the Capitol, in his
personal capacity,

)
)
)
)

Dekndanh.

)
ORDER

Civil Case No. 10-629 (RJL)

F or the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is this

A~1ay of August, 2011, hereby
ORDERED that the defendants' Motion to Dismiss [#8] is GRANTED; it is
further

ORDERED that the above-captioned case is DISMISSED with prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

United States District Judge