COLBERT v. OHIO COURT OF APPEALS

Filing 3

MEMORANDUM OPINION Signed by Judge Thomas F. Hogan on 7/29/2010. (ls, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Antonio Colbert, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FILED AUG - 5 ""'!1. .. {. Clerk. U.S. DistricI & Bankruj.ltcy COUr1B for the District of Columbia Civil Action No. v. Ohio Supreme Court of Appeals, Defendant. 10 1312 MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on plaintiff s pro se complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant plaintiffs application and dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff is a District of Columbia resident suing the appellate courts of the state of Ohio for unknown reasons. He does not accuse the defendant of any wrongdoing or attribute any conduct to it. In any event, this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to review the decisions (or lack thereof) of another court, see 28 U.S.c. 1331, 1332 (general jurisdictional provisions); Flemingv. United States, 847 F. Supp. 170, 172 (D.D.C. 1994), cert. denied 513 U.S. 1150 (1995). A separate Order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. /' Oate{)tt/1Q ,2010

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?