COLBERT v. OHIO COURT OF APPEALS

Filing 3

MEMORANDUM OPINION Signed by Judge Thomas F. Hogan on 7/29/2010. (ls, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Antonio Colbert, Plaintiff,
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

FILED
AUG - 5 ""'!1. ..
{.

Clerk. U.S. DistricI & Bankruj.ltcy COUr1B for the District of Columbia
Civil Action No.

v.
Ohio Supreme Court of Appeals, Defendant.

10 1312

MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on plaintiff s pro se complaint and application to proceed

in forma pauperis. The Court will grant plaintiffs application and dismiss the complaint for lack
of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff is a District of Columbia resident suing the appellate courts of the state of Ohio for unknown reasons. He does not accuse the defendant of any wrongdoing or attribute any conduct to it. In any event, this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to review the decisions (or lack thereof) of another court, see 28 U.S.c. §§ 1331, 1332 (general jurisdictional provisions);

Flemingv. United States, 847 F. Supp. 170, 172 (D.D.C. 1994), cert. denied 513 U.S. 1150
(1995). A separate Order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

/'

Oate{)tt/1Q ,2010