UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. et al

Filing 11

NOTICE OF TUNNEY ACT REQUIREMENTS by INTUIT, INC.. (Sims, Joe)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. et al Doc. 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC.; APPLE INC.; GOOGLE, INC.; INTEL CORPORATION; INTUIT, INC.; and PIXAR Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 1:10-cv-01629 Filed: Sept. 24, 2010 Judge: Kollar-Kotelly, Colleen Description: Antitrust DEFENDANT INTUIT, INC.'S DESCRIPTION OF WRITTEN OR ORAL COMMUNICATIONS CONCERNING THE PROPOSED FINAL JUDGMENT AND CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE UNDER 15 U.S.C. § 16(G) Pursuant to Section 2(g) of the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. § 16(g), defendant Intuit, Inc. ("Intuit"), by its attorneys, submits this pleading to describe all written or oral communications by or on behalf of Intuit with any officer or employee of the United States concerning the proposed Final Judgment filed in this action on September 24, 2010. In accordance with Section 2(g), this description excludes any communications "made by counsel of record alone with the Attorney General or the employees of the Department of Justice alone." 15 U.S.C. § 16(g). To the best of Intuit's knowledge, after appropriate inquiry, there have been no written or oral communications by or on behalf of Intuit with any officer or employee of the United States concerning the proposed Final Judgment, except for communications between counsel Dockets.Justia.com of record for Intuit and employees of the Department of Justice's Antitrust Division. Intuit therefore certifies that the requirements of Section 2(g) have been complied with and that this description of communications by or on behalf of Intuit and required to be reported under Section 2(g) is true and complete. Dated this 4th day of October 2010. Respectfully submitted, __________/s/ Joe Sims_______________ Joe Sims, Esq. (D.C. Bar No. 962050) Margaret Ward, Esq. (D.C. Bar No. 464508) Jones Day 51 Louisiana Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20001 Telephone: (202) 879-3863 Fax: (202) 626-1700 Email: jsims@jonesday.com Counsel for Intuit, Inc. 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Description of Written or Oral Communications Concerning the Proposed Final Judgment in This Action and Certification of Compliance Under 15 U.S.C. § 16(g) by Intuit, Inc. was served electronically by means of the Court's ECF system and by first-class mail this fourth day of October 2010 upon each of the parties listed below: FOR THE UNITED STATES Ryan Struve, Esq. Trial Attorney Networks & Technology Section U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division 450 5th St., NW Washington, DC 20530 Telephone: (202) 307-6200 Facsimile: (202) 616-8544 Email: ryan.struve@usdoj.gov FOR DEFENDANT ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. Craig A. Waldman, Esq. Jones Day 555 California Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 626-3939 Fax: (415) 963-6813 Email: cwaldman@jonesday.com FOR DEFENDANT APPLE INC. Richard Parker, Esq. O'Melveny & Myers LLP 1625 Eye Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 Telephone: (202) 383-5380 Fax: (202) 383-5414 Email: rparker@omm.com FOR DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC. Mark Leddy, Esq. Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP 2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 Telephone: (202) 974-1570 Fax: (202) 974-1999 Email: mleddy@cgsh.com FOR DEFENDANT INTEL CORPORATION Leon B. Greenfield, Esq. WilmerHale 1875 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 Telephone: (202) 663-6972 Fax: (202) 663-6363 Email: Leon.Greenfield@wilmerhale.com FOR DEFENDANT PIXAR Deborah A. Garza, Esq. Covington & Burling LLP 1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 Telephone: (202) 662-5146 Fax: (202) 778-5146 Email: dgarza@cov.com _/s/ Joe Sims____ Joe Sims, Esq. D.C. Bar No. 962050 Jones Day 51 Louisiana Ave. NW Washington, D.C. 20001 Telephone: (202) 879-3863 Fax: (202) 626-1700 Email: jsims@jonesday.com Counsel for Intuit, Inc. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?