JENKO v. GATES et al
Filing
21
ORDER, For the reasons set forth above, it is this 22nd day of December, 2011 hereby ORDERED that Defendant United States' Motion to Dismiss Counts Five Through Seventeen 13 , and Individual Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Counts One Through Four and Count Eighteen 14 , are GRANTED, and it is further ORDERED that the above-captioned case be dismissed with prejudice. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Richard J. Leon on 12/22/2011. (see order) (kc )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
ABDUL RAHIM ABDUL RAZAK AL JANKO, )
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
ROBERT M. GATES,
)
)
DONALD RUMSFELD,
)
)
PAUL WOLFOWITZ,
)
)
GORDON ENGLAND,
)
)
REAR ADM. JAMES M. McGARRAH,
)
)
RICHARD B. MYERS,
)
)
PETER PACE,
)
)
MICHAEL GLENN "MIKE" MULLEN,
)
)
GARY SPEER,
)
)
JAMES T. HILL,
)
)
BANTZ CRADDOCK,
)
)
JAMES G. ST AVRIDIS,
)
)
MAJ. GEN. GEOFFREY D. MILLER,
)
)
Civil Case No. 10-1702 (RJL)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
BRIG. GEN. JAY HOOD,
REAR ADM. HARRY B. HARRIS, JR.,
MARK H. BUZBY,
DAVID THOMAS,
THOMAS H. COPEMAN III,
ADOLPH MCQUEEN,
BRIG. GEN. NELSON J. CANNON,
COL. MICHAEL BUMGARNER,
COL. WADE DENNIS,
ESTEBAN RODRIGUEZ,
PAUL RESTER,
DANIEL MCNEILL,
FRANK WIERCINSKI,
DOES 1-100
Defendants.
ORDER
[Dkt. ## 13, 14~
For the reasons set forth above, it is thisl.1--.day ofDecember, 2011 hereby
ORDERED that Defendant United States' Motion to Dismiss Counts Five
Through Seventeen [Dkt. #13], and Individual Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Counts
One Through Four and Count Eighteen [Dkt. #14], are GRANTED; and it is further
2
ORDERED that the above-captioned case be dismissed with prejudice.
SO ORDERED.
United States District Judge
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?